Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Joint Formal Opinion 2024-200: Ethical Issues Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence
Pennsylvania Bar Association Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility and Philadelphia Bar Association Professional Guidance Committee · Pennsylvania
last revised 2024-05-22last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Ethics opinionIn forceCompetenceVerification dutyConfidentialityClient consentSupervision
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIDuty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsBilling for AI workTechnological competenceClient consent and transparency
A joint opinion of the Pennsylvania and Philadelphia bar ethics committees concluding that, with appropriate safeguards, lawyers may use AI consistently with the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. It sets out twelve best practices spanning truthfulness, citation verification, competence, confidentiality, conflicts, client communication, bias, misuse, billing, professional judgment and transparency.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 22 May 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- With appropriate safeguards, lawyers may use AI in accordance with the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct
- Lawyers must be competent in the use of AI technologies and must verify that citations accurately reflect the content referenced
- Lawyers must safeguard client information and ensure AI systems handling it adhere to strict confidentiality measures
- Lawyers must communicate with clients about their AI use and, if necessary, obtain consent before using certain AI tools
- AI-related expenses must be reasonable and appropriately disclosed to clients
- Lawyers should be transparent with clients, colleagues and the courts about AI use, including its limitations and uncertainties
- AI does not replace personal review of cases, statutes and other legislative materials
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-05-22 | Initial publication | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Joint Formal Opinion 2024-200: Ethical Issues Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence" (Pennsylvania Bar Association Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility and Philadelphia Bar Association Professional Guidance Committee, Original, 2024-05-22), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-pa-joint-formal-opinion-2024-200 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court