Regulation Tracker / Australia
Guidelines for the use of generative AI
Supreme Court of Western Australia · Western Australia
last revised 2025-11-20last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityDisclosureCompetence
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigantsClient data in AI toolsAI-generated evidenceDisclosure of AI use in filingsBar guidance on generative AI
Principles-based guidelines of the Supreme Court of Western Australia for lawyers, self-represented litigants and expert witnesses. AI-generated content relied on in proceedings must be verified by a human who takes legal responsibility; confidential, suppressed or privileged material must not be entered into public tools; and AI use must be disclosed when the court directs.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- 20 Nov 2025
- Current version
- Published November 2025 · 20 Nov 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI-generated content must be verified by a human who takes legal responsibility for the document; that a document was AI-assisted is no answer to errors or omissions.
- Confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not be entered into public or unsecured generative AI tools.
- Affidavits and witness statements must be drafted in the witness's own words; AI content must not substitute the witness's voice.
- Expert reports must comply with the Harmonised Expert Witness Code of Conduct (Practice Direction 4.5.2.1); experts should consider what disclosure of AI use is needed.
- Generative AI must not be used to mislead the court or other parties about the work undertaken; use should be disclosed when directed or otherwise appropriate.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published November 2025current | 2025-11-20 | First issue, following the court's early-2025 consultation note. The document carries no date on its face; 2025-11-20 is taken from the PDF's creation metadata and should be re-confirmed against the court before it is treated as authoritative. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidelines for the use of generative AI" (Supreme Court of Western Australia, Published November 2025, 2025-11-20), safelegalai.com/regulation/australia/au-wa-supreme-court-generative-ai-guidelines (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Australia
- Practice Note SC GEN 25: The Use of Artificial Intelligence by Court Users · Supreme Court of Victoria
- Judicial Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence · Supreme Court of Victoria
- Practice Direction: Use of Artificial Intelligence (PD-AI) · FCFCOA
- Generative Artificial Intelligence Practice Note (GPN-AI) · Federal Court of Australia
- Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence · NSW Local Court
- A Solicitor's Guide to Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence · Law Society of NSW