Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Australia

Judicial Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence

Supreme Court of Victoria · Victoria

last revised 2026-05-14last verified 2026-10-051 versioncountry page →

GuidanceIn forceProhibitionConfidentialityVerification duty

map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentDuty to verify AI output

Guidelines issued by the Supreme Court of Victoria on 14 May 2026, alongside Practice Note SC GEN 25, governing judicial officers' and chambers staff use of AI. Judicial officers must not use generative AI for judicial decision-making; supportive uses such as organising materials, summaries, chronologies, research aids and proof-reading are permitted, and case-related work may use only Court-approved AI tools.

Applies to
judges, court-staff
Effective
14 May 2026
Current version
Original · 14 May 2026
Last verified
05 Oct 2026

What the document requires

  • Para 3.1: Judicial Officers must not use GenAI for judicial decision-making.
  • Para 3.4: permissible supportive uses include organising and locating case materials, summaries and chronologies, legal research aids and proof-reading, which do not replace reading the evidence and submissions.
  • Para 3.5: for case-related matters, Judicial Officers and Court staff must use only AI tools approved by the Court, approved with regard to confidentiality.
  • Para 3.6: Judicial Officers should give assisting staff clear directions on appropriate AI use and the disclosure they require.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Originalcurrent2026-05-14First version recorded.official · archive

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judicial Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence" (Supreme Court of Victoria, Original, 2026-05-14), safelegalai.com/regulation/australia/vic-supreme-court-judicial-ai-guidelines (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Australia