Skip to content

Regulation Tracker · Country · Europe

Slovenia

Early: one or two positionscivil lawupdated 2026-09-04verified 2026-09-04

EU-level rules also apply — see the European Union record →

As of 4 September 2026 Slovenia has an AI Act implementing statute, in force 21 November 2025, that makes the Information Commissioner the market-surveillance authority for justice-related high-risk systems, but no rule, bar guidance or reported case on lawyers' or judges' use of AI. The Slovenian Bar has held conferences only.

As of 2026-09-04, Slovenia has 1 binding rule, official guidance in 1 category, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. Binding rules cover horizontal AI statute. In 17 categories we found nothing; in 1 the position is not yet determined.

How to read this page
  • Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
  • Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
  • Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
  • Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
  • Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
  • Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.

The rules, category by category

Horizontal AI statute

Binding rule

verified 2026-09-04

The act implementing Regulation 2024/1689, adopted 23 October 2025 and in force 21 November 2025, designates five market-surveillance authorities: the Information Commissioner for prohibited practices and justice-related high-risk systems, AKOS as single contact point and sandbox operator, the Bank of Slovenia, the Insurance Supervision Agency and the Market Inspectorate.

Judges' use of AI

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No judicial guidance found as of 4 September 2026. The Ministry of Justice sent an information letter on the AI Act in October 2024 to the Constitutional and Supreme Courts, prosecution, bar and notaries; it is informational rather than guidance. Judicial AI tools are not yet implemented.

AI-generated evidence

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Supervision of AI work

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Billing for AI work

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Sanctions for AI misuse

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No Slovenian decision on hallucinated citations found as of 4 September 2026.

Mandatory AI training

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No mandatory AI training found as of 4 September 2026.

Arbitration and ADR

Not yet determined

verified 2026-09-04

Not researched because the research budget was exhausted.

Official documents recorded for Slovenia (1)

Court incidents on the record in Slovenia

all incidents →

Cite this page

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Slovenia" (updated 2026-09-04, verified 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/si (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.