Skip to content

Regulation Tracker · Country · Europe

Slovenia

Developingcivil lawupdated 2026-10-05verified 2026-09-04

EU-level rules also apply — see the European Union record →

As of 4 September 2026 Slovenia has an AI Act implementing statute, in force 21 November 2025, that makes the Information Commissioner the market-surveillance authority for justice-related high-risk systems, but no rule, bar guidance or reported case on lawyers' or judges' use of AI. The Slovenian Bar has held conferences only.

As of 2026-10-07, Slovenia has 2 binding rules, official guidance in 1 category, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. Binding rules cover horizontal AI statute, mandatory AI training. In 16 categories we found nothing; in 1 the position is not yet determined.

How to read this page
  • Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
  • Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
  • Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
  • Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
  • Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
  • Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.

The rules, category by category

Horizontal AI statute

Binding rule

verified 2026-09-04

The act implementing Regulation 2024/1689, adopted 23 October 2025 and in force 21 November 2025, designates five market-surveillance authorities: the Information Commissioner for prohibited practices and justice-related high-risk systems, AKOS as single contact point and sandbox operator, the Bank of Slovenia, the Insurance Supervision Agency and the Market Inspectorate.

Mandatory AI training

Binding rule

verified 2026-09-04

Article 4 of the EU AI Act, as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 from 27 July 2026, applies directly in Slovenia: providers and deployers, including law firms, must take measures to support the AI literacy of their staff, without having to guarantee any specific level. No national mandatory AI training for lawyers found as of 4 September 2026.

Judges' use of AI

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No judicial guidance found as of 4 September 2026. The Ministry of Justice sent an information letter on the AI Act in October 2024 to the Constitutional and Supreme Courts, prosecution, bar and notaries; it is informational rather than guidance. Judicial AI tools are not yet implemented.

AI-generated evidence

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Supervision of AI work

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Billing for AI work

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Sanctions for AI misuse

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No Slovenian decision on hallucinated citations found as of 4 September 2026.

Arbitration and ADR

Not yet determined

verified 2026-09-04

Not researched because the research budget was exhausted.

Official documents recorded for Slovenia (1)

Court incidents on the record in Slovenia

all incidents →

Cite this page

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Slovenia" (updated 2026-10-05, verified 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/si (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.