Regulation Tracker / International
Guidelines on the use of generative AI by courts and tribunals (CEPEJ(2025)18Final)
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Council of Europe
last revised 2025-12-19last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceDisclosureVerification dutyConfidentiality
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentDuty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsDisclosure of AI use in filingsData protection and legal AI
Guidelines adopted 19 December 2025 by the Council of Europe's CEPEJ for courts and tribunals in its 46 member states on using generative AI. Judicial use must be transparent, AI output can never bind a judge, the right to a human judge is guaranteed, and confidential case data must be protected. They replace the February 2024 information note.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 19 Dec 2025
- Current version
- Final · 19 Dec 2025
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- A human judge must always take the decision; generative AI output is never binding.
- Judicial use of generative AI should be transparent to parties where it affects proceedings.
- Confidential and personal data in case files must not be entered into unsecured tools.
- Outputs must be verified for accuracy before any reliance.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finalcurrent | 2025-12-19 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidelines on the use of generative AI by courts and tribunals (CEPEJ(2025)18Final)" (European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Council of Europe, Final, 2025-12-19), safelegalai.com/regulation/international/cepej-guidelines-generative-ai-courts (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in International
- UNCITRAL Working Group II exploratory work on the use of AI in dispute resolution · UNCITRAL WG II
- Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225) · CoE
- LCIA Arbitration Rules revision consultation (AI disclosure and guardrails) · LCIA
- Guidelines and Regulations to Provide Insights on Public Policies to Ensure AI's Beneficial Use as a Professional Tool · IBA ANLBS
- UNESCO Guidelines for the use of AI systems in courts and tribunals · UNESCO
- Ciarb Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration (2025) · Ciarb