BangladeshNo rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Regulation Tracker · Country · Asia-Pacific
Bangladesh
Checked: no rules foundcommon lawupdated 2026-09-04verified 2026-09-04
As of 4 September 2026 no rule, guidance or reported case on AI in legal practice was found for Bangladesh. The Supreme Court and Bar Council have issued nothing and commentary in the legal press calls for a courtroom AI policy. A National AI Policy adopted in early 2026 reportedly directs the Ministry of Law to draft an AI Act.
As of 2026-09-04, Bangladesh has 0 binding rules, official guidance in 0 categories, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. In 18 categories we found nothing; in 2 the position is not yet determined.
How to read this page
- Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
- Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
- Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
- Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
- Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
- Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.
The rules, category by category
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No Supreme Court policy on judges' AI use found as of 4 September 2026; The Daily Star and The Business Standard have argued that Bangladesh needs a courtroom AI policy soon.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No Bangladesh Bar Council guidance on generative AI found as of 4 September 2026.
No published court AI deployment policy found as of 4 September 2026.
No reported case of AI-fabricated citations before Bangladeshi courts found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
A Personal Data Protection Ordinance was reported in 2025 but could not be verified within the research budget; no AI-specific regulator guidance was found.
The National AI Policy 2026 reportedly directs the Ministry of Law to draft a comprehensive AI Act by 2028; the policy text could not be opened from an official source. No AI statute is in force.
Official documents recorded for Bangladesh (0)
- No documents recorded yet; category sources link the official pages.
Court incidents on the record in Bangladesh
- Yichang District Court (Hubei)2026-07-21 Warning
Cite this page
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Bangladesh" (updated 2026-09-04, verified 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/bd (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.