Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Louisiana Supreme Court Technology Commission: Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
Louisiana Supreme Court Technology Commission · Louisiana
last revised 2025-10-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →GuidanceIn forceVerification dutySupervisionConfidentiality
map categories:Judges' use of AIBar guidance on generative AIClient data in AI toolsDuty to verify AI outputSupervision of AI work
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Louisiana Supreme Court's Technology Commission issued advisory generative-AI guidelines in October 2025, chiefly for judges but addressing counsel. They call for active review and verification of AI output analogous to supervising a junior associate and warn against free consumer AI tools in favour of enterprise systems with security protocols.
- Applies to
- judges, lawyers, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 01 Oct 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Advisory only, primarily directed at judges but referencing obligations of counsel
- Lawyers should supervise AI output with active review and verification analogous to supervising a junior associate
- Cites ABA Formal Opinion 512
- Cautions against free consumer AI tools in favour of enterprise-grade systems with security protocols
- Document not opened in this research run
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-10-01 | Initial publication; the source gives a month only (issued October 2025), so the day is recorded as the 1st | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Louisiana Supreme Court Technology Commission: Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines" (Louisiana Supreme Court Technology Commission, Original, 2025-10-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-la-tech-commission-generative-ai-guidelines (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)