Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Thomas v. Pangburn, No. 4:23-cv-00046-RSB-CLR (CV423-046) (S.D. Ga.)

·US District Court, Southern District of Georgia (Savannah Division)·US-FEDDismissal

In the Southern District of Georgia, Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray found that pro se plaintiff Jerry Thomas cited ten nonexistent cases and never explained their origin, recommended dismissal of his amended complaint as a Rule 11(b) sanction while declining monetary sanctions; District Judge R. Stan Baker adopted the recommendation on January 29, 2024.

Court
US District Court, Southern District of Georgia (Savannah Division)
Date
2023-10-06
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Pro se plaintiff Jerry Thomas's filings cited ten cases that did not exist but were formatted to look legitimate; after two show-cause orders he apologised but never explained their origin. Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray found bad faith and recommended dismissal of the amended complaint as a Rule 11(b) sanction (in addition to judicial immunity), declining monetary sanctions; District Judge R. Stan Baker adopted the recommendation on Jan 29, 2024.
Outcome
Dismissal
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Thomas v. Pangburn, No. 4:23-cv-00046-RSB-CLR (CV423-046) (S.D. Ga.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/thomas-v-pangburn (accessed 2026-09-05). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →