Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Morgan v. Community Against Violence, No. 1:23-cv-00353-WPJ/JMR (D.N.M.)

·US District Court, District of New Mexico·US-FEDWarning

In the District of New Mexico, Chief Judge William P. Johnson found that pro se plaintiff Sorchè Morgan cited several fake or nonexistent opinions in her response brief, issued a final warning that further nonexistent citations could bring sanctions including dismissal, and in January 2024 dismissed the case with prejudice after finding more hallucinated cases. No monetary penalty.

Court
US District Court, District of New Mexico
Date
2023-10-23
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Pro se plaintiff Sorchè Morgan's response to a motion to dismiss cited several fake or nonexistent opinions, including a fabricated New Mexico case and four citations pointing to unrelated real cases. Chief Judge William P. Johnson warned that future nonexistent citations could bring striking, filing restrictions or dismissal; the case was dismissed with prejudice on Jan 19, 2024 after further hallucinated citations were found.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Morgan v. Community Against Violence, No. 1:23-cv-00353-WPJ/JMR (D.N.M.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/morgan-v-community-against-violence (accessed 2026-09-05). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →