Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)

·US District Court, Southern District of New York·US-FEDWarning

In the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the false citations, warned that future filings with false or nonexistent legal authorities may draw sanctions, and tied the warning to Rule 11 duties for pro se litigants.

Court
US District Court, Southern District of New York
Date
2026-08-27
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District of New York decisions in discovery briefing. The court identified the false authorities, pointed to Rule 11 obligations for pro se litigants, and warned that future submissions containing false or nonexistent authorities may result in sanctions.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/ashmeade-v-amazon (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →