Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Booker v. U.S. Bank National Association (In re Booker), No. 3:25-cv-01205-VDO (D. Conn.)

·US District Court for the District of Connecticut·US-FEDWarning

The US District Court for the District of Connecticut formally admonished a self-represented bankruptcy appellant under Rule 11 after finding six nonexistent cases and invented quotations in his briefs, despite his claim to have cross-checked four AI platforms. Judge Vernon Oliver dismissed the appeal on the merits and affirmed the bankruptcy court's order.

Court
US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Date
2026-08-05
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Self-represented bankruptcy appellant Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker III filed briefs containing six fabricated cases and multiple false quotations. He said he had cross-checked his research across four AI platforms; the court inferred that generative AI produced the fabrications.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-03

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Booker v. U.S. Bank National Association (In re Booker), No. 3:25-cv-01205-VDO (D. Conn.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-re-booker-d-conn (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →