Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Booker v. U.S. Bank National Association (In re Booker), No. 3:25-cv-01205-VDO (D. Conn.)
The US District Court for the District of Connecticut formally admonished a self-represented bankruptcy appellant under Rule 11 after finding six nonexistent cases and invented quotations in his briefs, despite his claim to have cross-checked four AI platforms. Judge Vernon Oliver dismissed the appeal on the merits and affirmed the bankruptcy court's order.
- Court
- US District Court for the District of Connecticut
- Date
- 2026-08-05
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Self-represented bankruptcy appellant Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker III filed briefs containing six fabricated cases and multiple false quotations. He said he had cross-checked his research across four AI platforms; the court inferred that generative AI produced the fabrications.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Verified against listed sources
- Last checked
- 2026-09-03
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Booker v. U.S. Bank National Association (In re Booker), No. 3:25-cv-01205-VDO (D. Conn.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-re-booker-d-conn (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.