Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)

·US District Court, District of Maryland·US-FEDWarning

In the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from generative AI, dismissed the action without prejudice and warned that continued use of hallucinated authorities risks sanctions.

Court
US District Court, District of Maryland
Date
2026-08-26
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
generative AI (suspected by court)
Conduct
Self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson cited Cooke v. Carrington Mortgage Services, No. 22-1425 (4th Cir. 2023), which the court could not locate by caption, docket number or Westlaw citation. The court said the case appeared to be hallucinated from generative AI and warned that continued citation to hallucinated authorities risks sanctions.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/johnson-v-nationstar (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →