Rafique v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 673 (TC)
dismissal
Before the First-tier Tax Tribunal, self-represented appellant Omar Rafique sent emails citing multiple non-existent authorities that Judge Bailey found were AI-generated and unreviewed. The tribunal refused to reinstate his struck-out appeal and declined to issue a contempt summons, warning him against relying on AI-hallucinated cases in any future proceedings.
- Date of decision/order
- 2026-05-06
- Court
- First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
- Jurisdiction
- UK
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- A self-represented appellant sent emails citing several authorities (including purported Perrin, Hanuman Commercial, Vardy Properties and Moulsdale Properties decisions) that did not exist. Judge Bailey found the text was AI-generated and had not been reviewed by the appellant, describing the cases as AI hallucinations.
- Consequence
- See outcome
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Rafique v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 673 (TC)", safelegalai.com/tracker/rafique-v-hmrc (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.