HMRC v Gunnarsson, [2025] UKUT 247 (TCC)
dismissal
Before the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), unrepresented respondent Marc Gunnarsson cited three non-existent First-tier Tribunal decisions produced by online AI software. The Upper Tribunal set aside the FTT decision, dismissed his appeal and confirmed recovery of £12,918 in wrongly claimed grants, warning that AI chatbots frequently mislead litigants in person.
- Date of decision/order
- 2025-07-23
- Court
- Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
- Jurisdiction
- UK
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- An unrepresented respondent cited three non-existent First-tier Tribunal decisions (Patel, Ali and Kamran v HMRC) in his skeleton argument. He acknowledged using online AI software to prepare his submissions; the fabricated authorities were removed in an amended skeleton the same day.
- Consequence
- See outcome
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "HMRC v Gunnarsson, [2025] UKUT 247 (TCC)", safelegalai.com/tracker/hmrc-v-gunnarsson (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.