Skip to content
SafeLegalAI

72 on the record · +1 this week

Incident Tracker

The Father v The Mother & Ors, [2025] EWHC 2135 (Fam)

dismissal

In the High Court (Family Division), a self-represented father seeking a judge's recusal submitted authorities that HHJ Bailey found were not genuine and appeared generated by AI. The case was referred to Mrs Justice Lieven as Family Presiding Judge, who dismissed the application, citing the Divisional Court's Ayinde ruling on fabricated citations.

Date of decision/order
2025-07-30
Court
High Court of England and Wales (Family Division)
Jurisdiction
UK
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
A self-represented father applying for a judge's recusal submitted written authorities that the first-instance judge, HHJ Bailey, found were not genuine and appeared to have been generated by AI. An exact count of the fabricated cases is not specified in the judgment.
Consequence
See outcome

Sources

Cite this incident

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "The Father v The Mother & Ors, [2025] EWHC 2135 (Fam)", safelegalai.com/tracker/father-v-mother-2025-ewhc-2135-fam (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.