Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)

·Colorado Court of Appeals·US-STATEWarning

In Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-AI hallucinations, the court declined sanctions but cautioned that future filings with unverified AI-generated authority may be sanctioned.

Court
Colorado Court of Appeals
Date
2026-08-27
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum cited three authorities the court could not verify, including one purported appellate decision dated in the future. The court said the brief appeared to reflect generative-AI drafting, applied Al-Hamim, declined sanctions, and warned that future AI-caused errors may be sanctioned.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/salloum-v-department-of-transportation (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →