Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo, No. C26-284-KKE (W.D. Wash.)

·US District Court, Western District of Washington·US-FEDWarning

In the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, plaintiff's counsel cited a nonexistent federal case in briefing against Turo. Judge Evanson described the citation as likely AI-fabricated, compelled arbitration, stayed the case and warned that fabricated authorities and missed deadlines fell below professional standards.

Court
US District Court, Western District of Washington
Date
2026-09-08
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Plaintiff's counsel cited a non-existent federal case in briefing against Turo and later replaced it after the issue was identified. The court described the citation as apparently fabricated and likely the result of AI, but did not impose sanctions at that stage.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-11

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Summary record: the facts above are verified against the listed sources, but the court's reasoning and later dispositions have not yet been written up. It is excluded from search indexes until that is done.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo, No. C26-284-KKE (W.D. Wash.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/gp-v-arevalo (accessed 2026-09-11). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →