Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00321-JCG (D. Del.)

·US District Court for the District of Delaware (Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves, sitting by designation)·US-FEDWarning

In a patent case in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, plaintiff's counsel promptly disclosed that a Strongsuit-assisted claim-construction brief contained errors. Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves discharged the show-cause order without Rule 11 sanctions, distinguishing lawyers who defend hallucinations from those who self-report, while warning that future AI mistakes in the case would be sanctioned.

Court
US District Court for the District of Delaware (Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves, sitting by designation)
Date
2026-08-20
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Strongsuit
Conduct
Plaintiff's counsel self-disclosed that a joint claim-construction brief prepared with the AI tool Strongsuit, used to generate an outline and pull deposition statements, contained multiple AI-induced errors, including a claim-construction position contrary to his own client's.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-03

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00321-JCG (D. Del.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/disruptive-resources-v-ballistic-barrier (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →