Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00321-JCG (D. Del.)
In a patent case in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, plaintiff's counsel promptly disclosed that a Strongsuit-assisted claim-construction brief contained errors. Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves discharged the show-cause order without Rule 11 sanctions, distinguishing lawyers who defend hallucinations from those who self-report, while warning that future AI mistakes in the case would be sanctioned.
- Court
- US District Court for the District of Delaware (Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves, sitting by designation)
- Date
- 2026-08-20
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Strongsuit
- Conduct
- Plaintiff's counsel self-disclosed that a joint claim-construction brief prepared with the AI tool Strongsuit, used to generate an outline and pull deposition statements, contained multiple AI-induced errors, including a claim-construction position contrary to his own client's.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Verified against listed sources
- Last checked
- 2026-09-03
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00321-JCG (D. Del.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/disruptive-resources-v-ballistic-barrier (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.