Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Shelbert v. Baxter International, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-06266 (N.D. Ill.)
In the Northern District of Illinois, Tyler Shelbert's lawyer filed a motion to strike that relied on a false reading of Instituto Nacional de Comercializacion Agricola. Judge Hunt inferred AI-assisted drafting, denied the motion, admonished counsel and warned both sides that false or hallucinated citations may lead to sanctions.
- Court
- US District Court, Northern District of Illinois
- Date
- 2026-08-26
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Plaintiff's lawyer moved to strike an answer while misusing Instituto Nacional de Comercializacion Agricola for propositions the case did not support. The court inferred AI-assisted drafting, denied the motion, admonished counsel, and warned both sides against filings containing false or hallucinated citations.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Verified against listed sources
- Last checked
- 2026-09-04
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Shelbert v. Baxter International, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-06266 (N.D. Ill.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/shelbert-v-baxter-international (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.