Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Shelbert v. Baxter International, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-06266 (N.D. Ill.)

·US District Court, Northern District of Illinois·US-FEDWarning

In the Northern District of Illinois, Tyler Shelbert's lawyer filed a motion to strike that relied on a false reading of Instituto Nacional de Comercializacion Agricola. Judge Hunt inferred AI-assisted drafting, denied the motion, admonished counsel and warned both sides that false or hallucinated citations may lead to sanctions.

Court
US District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Date
2026-08-26
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Plaintiff's lawyer moved to strike an answer while misusing Instituto Nacional de Comercializacion Agricola for propositions the case did not support. The court inferred AI-assisted drafting, denied the motion, admonished counsel, and warned both sides against filings containing false or hallucinated citations.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Shelbert v. Baxter International, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-06266 (N.D. Ill.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/shelbert-v-baxter-international (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →