Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Mid Central Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund v. HoosierVac LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00326-JPH-MJD (S.D. Ind.)

·US District Court, Southern District of Indiana (Terre Haute Division)·US-FEDSanctions

In the Southern District of Indiana, Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore recommended a $15,000 Rule 11 sanction against attorney Rafael Ramirez for three briefs citing non-existent AI-generated cases and referred him to the Chief Judge; on 28 May 2025 the district judge adopted the recommendation in part, reducing the sanction to $6,000.

Court
US District Court, Southern District of Indiana (Terre Haute Division)
Date
2025-05-28
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Defence counsel Rafael Ramirez filed three briefs (Dkts. 39, 52, 65) citing cases that do not exist, admitting at a show-cause hearing that he relied on generative AI tools without verifying the citations. Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore recommended a $15,000 Rule 11 sanction on 21 February 2025 and referred him to the Chief Judge; the district judge adopted the recommendation in part on 28 May 2025, imposing $6,000.
Outcome
Sanctions
Penalty
US$6,000
Regulatory outcome
Chief Judge, S.D. Ind. (Local Rule of Disciplinary Enforcement 2(a)); onward reference to the Indiana attorney disciplinary commission per Dkt. 103: Referred for consideration of further discipline; outcome of disciplinary reference not confirmed (2025-02-21)
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Mid Central Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund v. HoosierVac LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00326-JPH-MJD (S.D. Ind.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/mid-central-operating-engineers-v-hoosiervac (accessed 2026-09-05). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →