Skip to content
SafeLegalAI

72 on the record · +1 this week

Incident Tracker

Wadsworth v. Walmart, Inc., 348 F.R.D. 489 (D. Wyo. 2025)

sanctions

In the US District Court for Wyoming, three Morgan & Morgan attorneys filed motions in limine citing nine cases, eight non-existent, generated by the firm's internal AI tool. Judge Kelly Rankin fined lead drafter Rudwin Ayala $3,000 and revoked his pro hac vice status; T. Michael Morgan and Taly Goody were fined $1,000 each under Rule 11.

Date of decision/order
2025-02-24
Court
US District Court, District of Wyoming
Jurisdiction
US-FEDERAL
AI tool
Morgan & Morgan internal AI tool (MX2.law)
Conduct
Three plaintiffs' attorneys filed motions in limine on 22 January 2025 citing nine cases, eight of which did not exist. The fabricated authorities were produced using the firm's internal AI research tool; the drafter did not verify them before filing, and defendants noted some mis-cited cases also appear on ChatGPT.
Consequence
USD 5,000

Sources

Cite this incident

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Wadsworth v. Walmart, Inc., 348 F.R.D. 489 (D. Wyo. 2025)", safelegalai.com/tracker/wadsworth-v-walmart (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.