Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Benjamin v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 2:24-cv-7399 (LGD) (E.D.N.Y.)

·US District Court, Eastern District of New York·US-FEDFine

In the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst fined attorney Victoria Hovsepyan $1,000 under Rule 11 after she used the AI platform ChatOn to draft a reply on a remand motion that cited five fake cases; the court found subjective bad faith but declined any disciplinary referral.

Court
US District Court, Eastern District of New York
Date
2025-04-24
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
ChatOn
Conduct
Plaintiff's counsel Victoria Hovsepyan, pressed for time after a paralegal's draft proved unusable, used the AI app ChatOn to draft a reply in support of a motion to remand and filed it as a sworn affirmation without reading the cases; five cited cases were fake. Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst found a Rule 11 violation and subjective bad faith.
Outcome
Fine
Penalty
US$1,000
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-04

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Benjamin v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 2:24-cv-7399 (LGD) (E.D.N.Y.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/benjamin-v-costco (accessed 2026-09-05). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →