Dineen/Shibata v. Kotchka, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0606 PB (Ariz. Ct. App.)
sanctions
The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a probate ruling and sanctioned self-represented appellant Jeffrey Kotchka, whose opening brief cited hallucinated and misrepresented authorities produced by generative AI. Holding that self-represented litigants must abide by the same rules, the court awarded appellee Kim Dineen the attorneys' fees and costs caused by the fake citations under A.R.S. §12-349 and ARCAP 25.
- Date of decision/order
- 2026-07-15
- Court
- Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One
- Jurisdiction
- US-STATE
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Self-represented appellant Jeffrey Kotchka's opening brief, challenging a probate ruling, cited hallucinated legal authorities and misrepresented case citations that he obtained through generative AI ('Gen-AI') and did nothing to verify. After the appellee identified the fabrications and after a show-cause hearing, Kotchka neither moved to amend his brief nor withdrew the appeal, continuing to maintain claims unsupported by any valid authority.
- Consequence
- See outcome
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Dineen/Shibata v. Kotchka, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0606 PB (Ariz. Ct. App.)", safelegalai.com/tracker/dineen-shibata-v-kotchka (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.