Skip to content
SafeLegalAI

72 on the record · +1 this week

Incident Tracker

Dineen/Shibata v. Kotchka, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0606 PB (Ariz. Ct. App.)

sanctions

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a probate ruling and sanctioned self-represented appellant Jeffrey Kotchka, whose opening brief cited hallucinated and misrepresented authorities produced by generative AI. Holding that self-represented litigants must abide by the same rules, the court awarded appellee Kim Dineen the attorneys' fees and costs caused by the fake citations under A.R.S. §12-349 and ARCAP 25.

Date of decision/order
2026-07-15
Court
Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One
Jurisdiction
US-STATE
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Self-represented appellant Jeffrey Kotchka's opening brief, challenging a probate ruling, cited hallucinated legal authorities and misrepresented case citations that he obtained through generative AI ('Gen-AI') and did nothing to verify. After the appellee identified the fabrications and after a show-cause hearing, Kotchka neither moved to amend his brief nor withdrew the appeal, continuing to maintain claims unsupported by any valid authority.
Consequence
See outcome

Sources

Cite this incident

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Dineen/Shibata v. Kotchka, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0606 PB (Ariz. Ct. App.)", safelegalai.com/tracker/dineen-shibata-v-kotchka (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.