Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Akerlund v. Atlas Air, Inc. (Estate of Caviness v. Atlas Air), No. 24-11033 (11th Cir.)

·US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·US-FEDRegulatory referral

In a published opinion affirming dismissal of pilots' vaccine-mandate claims, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit condemned attorney Anthony Sabatini for briefs replete with fake and hallucinated citations, including replacement citations that were themselves fabricated, and referred him to the court's Committee on Lawyer Qualifications and Conduct.

Court
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date
2026-07-10
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Attorney Anthony F. Sabatini's opening brief in an appeal over airline pilots' vaccine-mandate claims relied on at least eight hallucinated cases. The corrected citations he supplied after the defendants objected were also hallucinated, and the court found he had not been candid with it.
Outcome
Regulatory referral
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
Eleventh Circuit Committee on Lawyer Qualifications and Conduct: The Chief Judge referred counsel to the Committee under Addendum Eight, Rule 2(C) of the court's rules. No disposition on record. (2026-07-10)
Status
Verified against listed sources
Last checked
2026-09-03

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Akerlund v. Atlas Air, Inc. (Estate of Caviness v. Atlas Air), No. 24-11033 (11th Cir.)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/akerlund-v-atlas-air (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →