Skip to content
SafeLegalAI

72 on the record · +1 this week

Incident Tracker

Specter Aviation Limited c. Laprade, 2025 QCCS 3521

fineunverified — pending primary-source confirmation

In Quebec, a self-represented litigant in Specter Aviation c. Laprade is reported to have filed a contestation containing eight AI-generated fabricated or irrelevant citations produced with ChatGPT. The Quebec Superior Court reportedly imposed a CAD $5,000 penalty under article 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure, reportedly Quebec's first AI-misuse sanction. The primary judgment remains to be confirmed.

Date of decision/order
2025-10-01
Court
Cour supérieure du Québec (Quebec Superior Court)
Jurisdiction
CANADA
AI tool
ChatGPT (reported)
Conduct
A self-represented litigant opposing homologation of an arbitral award is reported to have filed a contestation riddled with AI-generated non-existent case law and doctrine — eight instances of fabricated or irrelevant citations. The court reportedly found a serious breach of the conduct of proceedings under article 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Consequence
CAD 5,000

Sources

Cite this incident

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Specter Aviation Limited c. Laprade, 2025 QCCS 3521", safelegalai.com/tracker/specter-aviation-v-laprade (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.