Specter Aviation Limited c. Laprade, 2025 QCCS 3521
fineunverified — pending primary-source confirmation
In Quebec, a self-represented litigant in Specter Aviation c. Laprade is reported to have filed a contestation containing eight AI-generated fabricated or irrelevant citations produced with ChatGPT. The Quebec Superior Court reportedly imposed a CAD $5,000 penalty under article 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure, reportedly Quebec's first AI-misuse sanction. The primary judgment remains to be confirmed.
- Date of decision/order
- 2025-10-01
- Court
- Cour supérieure du Québec (Quebec Superior Court)
- Jurisdiction
- CANADA
- AI tool
- ChatGPT (reported)
- Conduct
- A self-represented litigant opposing homologation of an arbitral award is reported to have filed a contestation riddled with AI-generated non-existent case law and doctrine — eight instances of fabricated or irrelevant citations. The court reportedly found a serious breach of the conduct of proceedings under article 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
- Consequence
- CAD 5,000
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Specter Aviation Limited c. Laprade, 2025 QCCS 3521", safelegalai.com/tracker/specter-aviation-v-laprade (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.