Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / International

JAMS Rules Governing Disputes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems

JAMS

last revised 2024-06-14last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

Court ruleIn forceConfidentialityRecord-keeping

map categories:Arbitration and ADRAI-generated evidence

JAMS rules and model clause for arbitrating disputes about AI systems. They are procedural rules for AI subject-matter disputes rather than guidance on participants' use of AI: JAMS proposes panelists with technical expertise, and a default AI Disputes Protective Order limits inspection of AI systems, models and training data to experts in a secured environment.

Applies to
parties, lawyers, judges
Effective
14 Jun 2024
Current version
Effective · 14 Jun 2024
Last verified
04 Sept 2026
Official text
www.jamsadr.com/artificial-intelligence-disputes-clause-and-rules

What the document requires

  • Rule 15(b): JAMS proposes only panelists approved for disputes involving technical subject matter.
  • Rule 16.1(a): default AI Disputes Protective Order applies unless the parties agree otherwise.
  • Rule 16.1(b): production of AI systems and related materials is limited to experts in a secured environment, with no removal of materials.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Effectivecurrent2024-06-14First ADR rules specific to disputes about AI systems; announced 23 April 2024.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "JAMS Rules Governing Disputes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems" (JAMS, Effective, 2024-06-14), safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-jams-ai-disputes-rules (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in International