Orientacao Administrativa no 07/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Arbitrations
Brazil-Canada Arbitration and Mediation Centre (Centro de Arbitragem e Mediacao Brasil-Canada)
last revised 2025-07-17last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceConfidentialityVerification dutyDisclosure
map categories:Arbitration and ADR
Guidance for arbitrations administered by CAM-CCBC: all participants must understand AI tools and their limits; AI use must respect confidentiality; party representatives are responsible for the factual and legal accuracy of AI-assisted work; disclosure is not required as a general rule but should be discussed case by case; and arbitrators may not delegate decision-making to AI.
- Applies to
- parties, lawyers
- Effective
- 17 Jul 2025
- Current version
- Original · 17 Jul 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Participants are responsible for understanding AI tools and their limitations.
- Confidentiality and data-protection duties apply to AI use in arbitration.
- Representatives must review AI output for accuracy; no use of AI to disrupt proceedings or falsify evidence.
- Arbitrators retain their personal mandate; decision-making functions cannot be delegated.
- Disclosure decided case by case; CAM-CCBC itself does not use AI in administration.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-07-17 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Orientacao Administrativa no 07/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Arbitrations" (Brazil-Canada Arbitration and Mediation Centre (Centro de Arbitragem e Mediacao Brasil-Canada), Original, 2025-07-17), safelegalai.com/regulation/brazil/br-cam-ccbc-orientacao-administrativa-07-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Brazil
- TJPR 9th Civil Chamber: 2% bad-faith fine and OAB referral for AI-fabricated STJ precedent · TJPR
- National Plan for Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Legal Practice · OAB
- OAB/SP Ethics and Discipline Tribunal ruling on partners' duty to supervise AI use (proc. 25.0886.2025.014989-0) · OAB/SP TED
- STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve Juizado · STJ
- Resolução CNJ nº 615/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary · CNJ
- PL 2338/2023: Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence (Marco Legal da IA) · Congresso Nacional