OAB/SP Ethics and Discipline Tribunal ruling on partners' duty to supervise AI use (proc. 25.0886.2025.014989-0)
Sao Paulo Bar Ethics and Discipline Tribunal (Tribunal de Etica e Disciplina da OAB/SP, 1a Turma) · Sao Paulo
last revised 2026-04-16last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Ethics opinionIn forceSupervisionVerification duty
map categories:Supervision of AI workDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Sao Paulo Bar's ethics tribunal held that partners and managers must ensure AI use by associates, contractors, trainees and non-lawyer staff is supervised, and must fully review all AI-generated output before it is filed, with special care for case-law research, citing article 77 of the Code of Civil Procedure and OAB Recommendation 001/2024.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- 16 Apr 2026
- Current version
- Ruling of 16 April 2026 (published May 2026) · 16 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Partners are responsible for supervising AI use across the firm, including by non-lawyers.
- Full review of every AI output before filing.
- Heightened care where AI is used for legal research and case-law.
- Applies CPC art. 77 duty of truthfulness and Recomendacao 001/2024.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruling of 16 April 2026 (published May 2026)current | 2026-04-16 | Initial ruling; reported by Migalhas, official text not obtained. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "OAB/SP Ethics and Discipline Tribunal ruling on partners' duty to supervise AI use (proc. 25.0886.2025.014989-0)" (Sao Paulo Bar Ethics and Discipline Tribunal (Tribunal de Etica e Disciplina da OAB/SP, 1a Turma), Ruling of 16 April 2026 (published May 2026), 2026-04-16), safelegalai.com/regulation/brazil/br-oab-sp-ted-supervisao-ia-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Brazil
- TJPR 9th Civil Chamber: 2% bad-faith fine and OAB referral for AI-fabricated STJ precedent · TJPR
- National Plan for Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Legal Practice · OAB
- Orientacao Administrativa no 07/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Arbitrations · CAM-CCBC
- STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve Juizado · STJ
- Resolução CNJ nº 615/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary · CNJ
- PL 2338/2023: Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence (Marco Legal da IA) · Congresso Nacional