Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Brazil

STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve Juizado

Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica)

last revised 2025-06-02last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

Judgment (guidance)In forcePermissive

map categories:Consumer AI legal servicesSelf-represented litigants

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

The President of the Superior Court of Justice refused OAB/RJ's request to suspend a platform selling AI-drafted small-claims petitions for about twenty reais, finding no prima facie unauthorised practice where the law lets citizens litigate without counsel and calling it paradoxical to bar digital tools from those entitled to represent themselves.

Applies to
providers, litigants
Effective
02 Jun 2025
Current version
Decision of STJ President Herman Benjamin · 02 Jun 2025
Last verified
04 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • No prima facie unauthorised practice of law in AI-assisted drafting for small-claims courts.
  • Citizens entitled to self-represent may use AI tools.
  • Modest fees distinguished from professional legal fees.
  • Merits later decided against OAB/RJ by the 27th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Decision of STJ President Herman Benjamincurrent2025-06-02Initial decision; the merits were later rejected by the 27th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro in November 2025.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve Juizado" (Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica), Decision of STJ President Herman Benjamin, 2025-06-02), safelegalai.com/regulation/brazil/br-stj-sls-3596-resolve-juizado-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Brazil