STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve Juizado
Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica)
last revised 2025-06-02last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forcePermissive
map categories:Consumer AI legal servicesSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The President of the Superior Court of Justice refused OAB/RJ's request to suspend a platform selling AI-drafted small-claims petitions for about twenty reais, finding no prima facie unauthorised practice where the law lets citizens litigate without counsel and calling it paradoxical to bar digital tools from those entitled to represent themselves.
- Applies to
- providers, litigants
- Effective
- 02 Jun 2025
- Current version
- Decision of STJ President Herman Benjamin · 02 Jun 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- No prima facie unauthorised practice of law in AI-assisted drafting for small-claims courts.
- Citizens entitled to self-represent may use AI tools.
- Modest fees distinguished from professional legal fees.
- Merits later decided against OAB/RJ by the 27th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision of STJ President Herman Benjamincurrent | 2025-06-02 | Initial decision; the merits were later rejected by the 27th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro in November 2025. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve Juizado" (Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica), Decision of STJ President Herman Benjamin, 2025-06-02), safelegalai.com/regulation/brazil/br-stj-sls-3596-resolve-juizado-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Brazil
- TJPR 9th Civil Chamber: 2% bad-faith fine and OAB referral for AI-fabricated STJ precedent · TJPR
- National Plan for Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Legal Practice · OAB
- OAB/SP Ethics and Discipline Tribunal ruling on partners' duty to supervise AI use (proc. 25.0886.2025.014989-0) · OAB/SP TED
- Orientacao Administrativa no 07/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Arbitrations · CAM-CCBC
- Resolução CNJ nº 615/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary · CNJ
- PL 2338/2023: Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence (Marco Legal da IA) · Congresso Nacional