Regulation Tracker / International
SCC Guide to the use of artificial intelligence in cases administered under the SCC Rules
SCC Arbitration Institute (Stockholm Chamber of Commerce)
last revised 2024-10-16last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceConfidentialityVerification dutyDisclosurePermissive
map categories:Arbitration and ADRAI barred from deciding casesAI-generated evidenceVendor due diligenceDisclosure of AI use in filings
Adopted by the SCC Board on 16 October 2024, this light-touch guide offers flexible, non-mandatory guidance to tribunals and participants in SCC cases. Citing the EU AI Act's high-risk classification of AI used by tribunals, it addresses confidentiality, quality through human review of outputs, integrity through disclosure of AI use, and non-delegation of arbitral decision-making.
- Applies to
- judges, parties, lawyers
- Effective
- 16 Oct 2024
- Current version
- Adopted by the SCC Board · 16 Oct 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Confidentiality: participants, especially tribunals, should understand how input data is used by AI tools.
- Quality: tribunals should apply an appropriate level of review and verification to AI outputs before use.
- Integrity: tribunals are encouraged to disclose any use of AI in researching or interpreting facts and law.
- Non-delegation: AI may support but cannot replace arbitral decision-making or its reasoning.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adopted by the SCC Boardcurrent | 2024-10-16 | Announced 17 October 2024. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "SCC Guide to the use of artificial intelligence in cases administered under the SCC Rules" (SCC Arbitration Institute (Stockholm Chamber of Commerce), Adopted by the SCC Board, 2024-10-16), safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-scc-guide-ai-arbitration (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in International
- UNCITRAL Working Group II exploratory work on the use of AI in dispute resolution · UNCITRAL WG II
- Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225) · CoE
- LCIA Arbitration Rules revision consultation (AI disclosure and guardrails) · LCIA
- Guidelines and Regulations to Provide Insights on Public Policies to Ensure AI's Beneficial Use as a Professional Tool · IBA ANLBS
- Guidelines on the use of generative AI by courts and tribunals (CEPEJ(2025)18Final) · CEPEJ
- UNESCO Guidelines for the use of AI systems in courts and tribunals · UNESCO