Ishfaq Ahmed v Mushtaq Ahmed, 2025 SCP 112 (PLD 2025 SC 582)
Supreme Court of Pakistan
last revised 2025-04-08last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification dutyProhibition
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesDuty to verify AI outputCourts' own AI deploymentArbitration and ADR
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Supreme Court of Pakistan judgment of April 2025 in a rent dispute in which Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah examined AI in the judiciary: AI can assist with research, drafting and case management but cannot replace judicial discretion, must respect the Article 10A fair-trial right, and hallucinated references require human verification.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 08 Apr 2025
- Current version
- Judgment, C.P.L.A. 1010-L/2022 · 08 Apr 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI is an assistive tool; human judges retain final responsibility and discretion.
- AI hallucination and black-box opacity require human oversight of AI-generated legal content.
- Recommends AI-driven, randomised case allocation to reduce partiality.
- NJPMC and the Law and Justice Commission to develop guidelines for permissible AI use in courts.
- Mediation and ADR cannot be replaced by AI.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judgment, C.P.L.A. 1010-L/2022current | 2025-04-08 | Original judgment (Mansoor Ali Shah and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi JJ); exact date within early April 2025 per the Sindh High Court research-cell digest. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Ishfaq Ahmed v Mushtaq Ahmed, 2025 SCP 112 (PLD 2025 SC 582)" (Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judgment, C.P.L.A. 1010-L/2022, 2025-04-08), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/pk-sc-ishfaq-ahmed-v-mushtaq-ahmed-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI