Regulation Tracker · Official documents
Official documents on AI in legal practice, versioned
Every official text behind the map, with its current version, when it was last revised and when we last verified it against the official source. Unverified entries are the ones whose official copy could not be opened directly; they are listed but kept out of search indexes. Download as JSON (CC BY 4.0) · mirror on Hugging Face and GitHub · US court instruments are collected by the open us-court-ai-orders pipeline.
Hugging Face| Jurisdiction | Body | Document | Type | Last revised | Last verified | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-STATECalifornia | California Legislature | California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitratorsDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Arbitration · Judges | Statute | 2026-09-30(+1) | 2026-10-05 | Enacted, not commenced |
| US-FED | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit | Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6unverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Court rule | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | Withdrawn |
| US-FED | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit | Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Guidance | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California | Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the CourtunverifiedDisclosure | Guidance | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Court) | Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned CasesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Kato) | Civil Standing OrderunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Oliver) | Judge’s Procedures: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Park) | Judge’s Procedures: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Roberts) | Important Notice: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Sagar) | Important Notice: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Scott) | Judge’s Procedures: Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Spaeth) | Important Notice: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Viramontes) | Important Notice: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Walter) | Order Re: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge II) | Judge’s Procedures: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California | Using AI Tools in Your CaseunverifiedLitigants | Guidance | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDColorado | District of Colorado (Judge Braswell) | Guidance on Responsible AI Use in Court ProceedingsunverifiedLitigants | Practice direction / note | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDColorado | District of Colorado (Judge Wang) | Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDHawaii | District of Hawaii (Judge Kobayashi) | Disclosure and Certification Requirements – Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDIowa | Southern District of Iowa | Artificial Intelligence (AI)unverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Guidance | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary) | Standing Order – Jury TrialsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden) | Standing Order for Courtroom 2309unverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan) | Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9unverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton) | Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60unverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan) | Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60unverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | Superseded |
| US-STATEIllinois | Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Wright) | Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 64unverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDIllinois | Northern District of Illinois (Judge Coleman) | Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman RequirementsunverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDIllinois | Northern District of Illinois (Judge Johnston) | Artificial Intelligence (AI)unverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDIllinois | Northern District of Illinois (Judge Valdez) | Judge Maria Valdez RequirementsunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDMissouri | Eastern District of Missouri | Artificial Intelligence Notice to Attorneys and Self-Represented PartiesunverifiedLitigants | Guidance | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNebraska | District of Nebraska | Nebraska Civil Rule 7.1(d) Generative Artificial Intelligence and Certificate of ComplianceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Court rule | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNew Mexico | District of New Mexico (Judge Strickland) | Standing Order Establishing Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative AIunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, New York County, Matrimonial Division (Judge Jr.) | Part 44 Matrimonial Division Rules: Artificial Intelligence ProgramsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, New York County, Civil Term (Judge Crawford) | Individual Part Rules: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedEvidence | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, New York County, Civil Term (Judge Frank) | Part 11 Rules: Use of Artificial Intelligence ProgramsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, New York County, Civil Term (Judge King) | Part 6 Rules: The Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, Queens County, Civil Term (Judge Lancman) | Part 20 Rules: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, New York County (Judge Waterman-Marshall) | IAS Part 31 Rules: Use of Artificial Intelligence in FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | Saratoga County Surrogate’s Court / County Court (Judge Schopf) | Local Court Rules: Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Evidence | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEOhio | Williams County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division | Juvenile Local Rule 1.4, Use of TechnologyunverifiedDisclosure · Evidence | Court rule | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEOhio | Courts of Common Pleas, Probate Division, Defiance, Fulton, Henry, and Williams Counties | Probate Local Rule 80, Use of TechnologyunverifiedDisclosure · Evidence | Court rule | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDOhio | Northern District of Ohio (Judge Boyko) | Court’s Standing Order on the Use of Generative AIunverifiedLitigants · No AI deciding | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEOregon | Oregon Court of Appeals | Notice Regarding Court Imposition of Sanctions for Submission of Fabricated Authority Produced by AIunverifiedVerify | Guidance | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Judge Cinquanto) | Judge Goldner Cinquanto’s Policies and Procedures: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Middle District of Pennsylvania (Judge Camoni) | Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni Page: Use of Generative AIunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Middle District of Pennsylvania (Judge Caraballo) | Magistrate Judge Phillip Caraballo Page: Use of Generative AIunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Middle District of Pennsylvania (Judge Latella) | Magistrate Judge Leo A. Latella Page: Use of Generative AIunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Middle District of Pennsylvania (Judge Mehalchick) | Judge Karoline Mehalchick Page: Use of Generative AIunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDWisconsin | Eastern District of Wisconsin | Representing YourselfunverifiedLitigants | Guidance | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Lin) | Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Judge Rita F. LinunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Mahkamah Agung | Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal CodesClient data · Judges · Court AI | Policy | 2026-09-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | Supreme Court of India | Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v Union of India, 2026 INSC 947No AI deciding · Verify · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-09-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Lietuvos advokatūra | AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas]Training · Bar guidance | Policy | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDGeorgia | Northern District of Georgia (Judge Johnson) | Guidelines to Parties and Counsel in Civil Cases: Disclosure of Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDVirginia | Eastern District of Virginia (Judge Lauck) | In re Local Civil Rule 7(E) and Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Lee) | Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Judge Eumi K. LeeunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-08-31 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of Japan | Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request)unverifiedCourt AI · Judges · No AI deciding | Policy | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB) | Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi]Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence · Supervision · Billing · Consumer AI · Training · Vendors · Disclosure · Sanctions | Guidance | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Prime Minister of Vietnam | Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045AI statute | Policy | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Tarrant County Criminal Courts | Tarrant County Criminal Local Rule 5.33: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2026-08-27 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Martínez-Olguín) | Standing Order for Civil Cases Before District Judge Araceli Martínez-OlguínunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-08-26 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Panola County Court at Law and County Court (Judge McLane) | Panola County Court at Law and County Court Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-08-21 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Misuse of AI: Warning noticeVerify · Client data · Supervision · Competence · Bar guidance · Sanctions | Guidance | 2026-08-17 | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| US-FEDNevada | District of Nevada (Judge III) | Second Amended Standing Order and Chambers PracticesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-08-17 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | Superior Court of California, County of Orange (Judge Knill) | Department C31 Standing Order Re: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-08-10 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEConnecticut | Connecticut Judicial Branch | Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final ReportJudges · Court AI · Evidence · Disclosure | Report | 2026-08-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | PERADI | Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan]unverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · No AI deciding · Training | Guidance | 2026-08-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDMaryland | District of Maryland (Judge III) | Standing Order 2026-03: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-08-05 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Hwang) | Standing Order for Criminal Cases Assigned to Judge Anne HwangunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-08-03 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| UK | Administrative Court | Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2026, para 2.3: Using Artificial Intelligence toolsVerify · Litigants · Sanctions | Guidance | 2026-08-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-FEDGeorgia | Northern District of Georgia (Judge Jones) | Instructions for Cases Assigned to the Honorable Steve C. Jones: Disclosure of Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-08-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Southern District of Texas (Judge Marmolejo) | Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo Criminal Court Procedures Section 7unverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2026-08-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Hwang) | Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Anne HwangunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-07-31 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| IE | Irish High Court | Practice Direction HC 142: Responsible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court DocumentsDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Sanctions · Supervision | Practice direction / note | 2026-07-29 | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (Judge Emadi) | Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence and Certification of Citations in Judge Emadi’s DivisionunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-07-29 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNorth Carolina | Western District of North Carolina | In re Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-07-29 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| EU | EU | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act)AI statute · Judges · Data protection · Evidence · Vendors | Statute | 2026-07-27(+1) | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | Poland | Ustawa z dnia 3 lipca 2026 r. o systemach sztucznej inteligencjiAI statute · Court AI · Vendors | Statute | 2026-07-27 | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| EU | EU | Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI)AI statute · Judges | Statute | 2026-07-24 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Hsu) | Standing Order for Newly Assigned Civil CasesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants · Evidence | Standing order | 2026-07-23 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Germany | KI-Marktüberwachungs- und Innovationsförderungsgesetz (KI-MIG)AI statute · Judges · Court AI · Vendors | Statute | 2026-07-22 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (Judge Ellerbe) | Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence and Certification of Citations in Judge Kelly Lee Ellerbe’s DivisionunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-07-22 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 394th Judicial District Court of Texas (Judge Kimball) | 394th Judicial District Court Updated Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-07-22 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| IE | Ireland | Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Act 2026AI statute · Court AI · Data protection · Vendors | Statute | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| US-STATEIowa | Iowa Supreme Court and Iowa Judicial Branch | Chapter 27, Judicial Use of Artificial Intelligence ToolsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Court AI | Standing order | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Guidelines on the transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI ActAI statute · Client consent · Evidence | Guidance | 2026-07-20(+1) | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| OTHER | Parliament (GR) | Law 5321/2026: measures for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and amendment of Law 4961/2022AI statute · Data protection | Statute | 2026-07-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | BCI | Bar Council of India circular on digital and social-media conduct and professional responsibility of advocatesunverifiedBar guidance · Evidence · Disclosure | Regulation | 2026-07-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| ZA | SA Judiciary Conference | 2026 Judiciary Conference Resolutions, Section 5 — Information Communication Technology, Digitisation and Artificial IntelligenceJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Training · Vendors · Client data | Policy | 2026-07-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Asamblea Nacional | Bill reforming the Organic Code of the Judicial Function to regulate AI use in judicial proceedingsunverifiedVerify · Sanctions · No AI deciding | Statute | 2026-07-13 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| INTL | UNCITRAL WG II | UNCITRAL Working Group II exploratory work on the use of AI in dispute resolutionArbitration | Consultation | 2026-07-10(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| OTHER | NAIO | Public Consultation: Proposed Artificial Intelligence (AI) Governance BillAI statute | Consultation | 2026-07-10 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Slaughter) | Civil Standing OrderunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-07-10 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| EU | EU AI Office | Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated ContentAI statute · Evidence | Guidance | 2026-07-09(+1) | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| CABritish Columbia | BC Provincial Court | Guidance on using AI to prepare for courtLitigants · Verify · Disclosure · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-07-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | Supreme Court of India | Pooja Ramesh Singh v Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd, 2026 INSC 668Verify · Sanctions · No AI deciding · Bar guidance | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-07-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Norwegian Supreme Court | Veiledning for advokater, section 19 'Bruk av KI-verktøy'Verify · Competence · Bar guidance · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-07-01(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | TCC | Technology and Construction Court Guide 2026 (fourth edition), section 1.6: The Use of Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Client data | Guidance | 2026-07-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Scarsi) | Initial Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Mark C. ScarsiunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-07-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Bexar County Civil District Courts | Bexar County Civil District Courts Local Rules A.I. CertificationunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Court rule | 2026-07-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Texas Business Court | Texas Business Court Local Rule 10(c): Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure | Court rule | 2026-07-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| ZA | LSSA AI Committee | Revised Ethics Guidelines for Legal Practitioners in South Africa on the Use of Generative AIBar guidance · Verify · Competence · Client data | Guidance | 2026-07-01 | 2026-09-03 | Proposed |
| BRParana | TJPR | TJPR 9th Civil Chamber: 2% bad-faith fine and OAB referral for AI-fabricated STJ precedentunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-06-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | CJC | The Use of AI for the Preparation of Court Documents: Update on Consultation FindingsDisclosure · Verify | Report | 2026-06-30 | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, New York County, Civil Term (Judge Ramseur) | Part 34 Practices and Procedures: Artificial Intelligence ProgramsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-06-30 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Chhabria) | Judge Chhabria Civil Standing OrderunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-06-26 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Western District of Texas (Judge Gonzalez) | Standing Order Concerning the Use of Artificial Intelligence Before Judge Ernest GonzalezunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-06-25 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of Nepal | Judiciary Information and Communication Technology Policy, 2083 (2026)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Training | Policy | 2026-06-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEConnecticut | Connecticut Judicial Branch | Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance | Court rule | 2026-06-23 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| US-STATEConnecticut | Connecticut Superior Court | Practice Book Amendments: Generative Artificial Intelligence ComplianceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2026-06-23 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATERhode Island | RI Supreme Court | In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI GuidelinesBar guidance · Judges · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Supervision · Evidence · Client consent | Court rule | 2026-06-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Comite de Etica FJ | Protocol for the use of artificial intelligence in the Judicial Function (Ethics Committee)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Disclosure · Client data · Court AI | Policy | 2026-06-16 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| IN | Supreme Court of India | Draft Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026Disclosure · Judges · No AI deciding · Verify · Court AI · Litigants · Vendors · Training | Regulation | 2026-06-16(+1) | 2026-09-05 | Consultation |
| US-FEDWest Virginia | Northern District of West Virginia (Judge Kleeh) | Standing Order in re Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools to Review Criminal DiscoveryunverifiedDisclosure · Client data | Standing order | 2026-06-16 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| BR | OAB | National Plan for Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Legal PracticeunverifiedBar guidance · Competence · Training | Policy | 2026-06-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDAlabama | Northern District of Alabama (Judge Manasco) | Initial Order Governing All Further Proceedings: Warning Regarding Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-06-15 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | NRA | Amendments to the Collection of Rules of Advocates' Ethics and Dignity of the Profession introducing § 23e on technology and AIBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2026-06-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Effective supervision guidance (AI sections)unverifiedSupervision · Competence · Verify | Guidance | 2026-06-12 | 2026-09-08 | In force |
| OTHER | Consejo de Estado | Council of State, Third Section: parameters for AI use in proceedings and disciplinary referralunverifiedSanctions · Verify · No AI deciding | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-06-09 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York State Supreme Court, Niagara County (Judge Norris) | Part 3 Rules: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Evidence | Standing order | 2026-06-05 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FED | US Judicial Conference | Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated EvidenceEvidence | Court rule | 2026-06-04 | 2026-09-03 | Proposed |
| US-STATETexas | District Courts of Calhoun, DeWitt, Goliad, Jackson, Refugio and Victoria Counties (Judge Garza) | Calhoun, DeWitt, Goliad, Jackson, Refugio and Victoria District Courts AI Standing OrderunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-06-04 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEOhio | Ohio Board of Professional Conduct | Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial OfficersBar guidance · Judges · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Guidance | 2026-06-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Andmekaitse Inspektsioon | Artificial intelligence guidance hub [Tehisaru]Data protection · AI statute | Guidance | 2026-06-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | Law Society | Generative AI: the essentialsBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Guidance | 2026-06-01(+1) | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NY Unified Court System | 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence TechnologyDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2026-06-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Staton) | Initial Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Josephine L. StatonunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-05-29 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Staton) | Order Re Criminal ProceedingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-05-29 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | Florida Supreme Court | In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673Disclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2026-05-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDNew Jersey | District of New Jersey (Judge Padin) | General Pretrial and Trial Procedures: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-05-28 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDFlorida | Middle District of Florida (Judge Moe) | Standing Order Requiring Disclosure of the Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-05-27 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Southern District of Texas (Judge Olvera) | Judge Rolando Olvera Mandatory Certificate Regarding Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-05-22 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| IE | Law Society of Ireland | Use of Generative AI: Guidance for the Legal ProfessionBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Client consent · Competence · Supervision · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2026-05-20(+1) | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Draft Commission Guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems (Article 6)AI statute · Judges | Guidance | 2026-05-19 | 2026-09-16 | Consultation |
| US-STATEFlorida | Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida (Judge Orshan) | Administrative Order No. 26-15: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings by Attorneys and Self-Represented LitigantsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-05-19 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | State Bar of California | Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law | Guidance | 2026-05-18(+1) | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| UK | BSB | Guidance on the use of Artificial Intelligence and Other TechnologiesBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-05-18 | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| US-FED | Federal Rules of Evidence / Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules | Proposed Rule 707: Evidence Produced by Artificial Intelligence and Presented at Trial Without an ExpertunverifiedEvidence | Court rule | 2026-05-17 | 2026-09-06 | Proposed |
| INTL | CoE | Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225)AI statute · Data protection · Evidence | Statute | 2026-05-15(+2) | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| AUVictoria | Supreme Court of Victoria | Practice Note SC GEN 25: The Use of Artificial Intelligence by Court UsersDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Practice direction / note | 2026-05-14 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| AUVictoria | Supreme Court of Victoria | Judicial Guidelines on the Use of Artificial IntelligenceJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Verify | Guidance | 2026-05-14 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 25th and 2nd 25th District Courts of Texas (Judge Crawford) | 25th and 2nd 25th District Courts Standing Order on Use of Generative AIunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-05-12 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Subramanian) | Individual Practices in Civil Cases: Use of ChatGPT and Other ToolsunverifiedVerify | Standing order | 2026-05-11 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Collin County District Courts (Judge Judges) | Collin County District Courts Local Rules: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedLitigants | Court rule | 2026-05-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| AU | FCFCOA | Practice Direction: Use of Artificial Intelligence (PD-AI)unverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2026-05-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEAlabama | Alabama State Bar | Alabama State Bar Formal Opinion 2026-01: Artificial Intelligence Use — Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct RulesBar guidance · Disclosure · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision | Ethics opinion | 2026-05-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NJPMC | National Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial InstitutionsunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Training · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-04-29 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | MoCDTI | Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025-2035unverifiedAI statute | Policy | 2026-04-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Corte Suprema | Supreme Court Rol 23.322-2025: suspension and fine for AI-fabricated doctrinal citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Judicial Yuan | Reference Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by the Judicial Yuan and Subordinate AgenciesunverifiedJudges · Verify · Court AI · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AU | Federal Court of Australia | Generative Artificial Intelligence Practice Note (GPN-AI)Disclosure · Verify · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2026-04-16 | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| BRSao Paulo | OAB/SP TED | OAB/SP Ethics and Discipline Tribunal ruling on partners' duty to supervise AI use (proc. 25.0886.2025.014989-0)unverifiedSupervision · Verify | Ethics opinion | 2026-04-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Williamson County District Courts and County Courts at Law | Williamson County Local Rules: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Court rule | 2026-04-14 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | CGAE | CGAE Interpretive Circular 3/2026: use of generative AI systems and the duty of verificationVerify · Supervision · Competence · Bar guidance · Sanctions · Training | Ethics opinion | 2026-04-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| ZA | DCDT | Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy (published GN 3880 of 2026; withdrawn by Notice 3978 of 2026)AI statute · Sanctions | Policy | 2026-04-10(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Withdrawn |
| OTHER | CSM | CSM Recommendations on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial activity (Recomendacoes no uso de IA)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Data protection · Training · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-04-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INPunjab, Haryana and Chandigarh | Punjab and Haryana High Court | Directive prohibiting judicial officers from using AI tools for judgments and legal researchunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding | Policy | 2026-04-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERNavarre | TSJ Navarra | TSJ Navarra, Social Chamber (Apr 2026): Art. 247 LEC proceedings archived after apology for AI-invented citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-04-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| SG | Law Society of Singapore | Advisory on the Use of Publicly Available AI ToolsBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Competence · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-04-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDFlorida | M.D. Fla. (Berger) | Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger)Disclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Standing order | 2026-04-02 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| INGujarat | Gujarat High Court | Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial and Court AdministrationJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Vendors · Training | Policy | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | JPDP | Guideline on Automated Decision-Making and Profiling (ADMP) under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010Data protection · Client consent · Vendors | Regulation | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, New York County, Civil Term (Judge Bannon) | Part 61 Rules: Generative Artificial Intelligence Certification and Remote-Appearance BanunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Standing order | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 284th District Court of Montgomery County (Judge Bays) | 284th District Court Standing Order on Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 457th District Court of Montgomery County (Judge Santini) | 457th District Court Standing Order on Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Southern District of Texas (Judge Kazen) | Judge John A. Kazen Civil Court Procedures Section 8unverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| ZA | OCJ | Draft Policy on Artificial Intelligence for the Judiciary in South AfricaunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Client data · Vendors | Policy | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| EU | CCBE | CCBE Technical guide on the use of AI tools and models by lawyers (Edition 2026)Vendors · Client data · Competence · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2026-03-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IL | Israel Courts Administration | Ethical Code for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Judicial Authority (Courts Administration Procedure No. 01-26)unverifiedJudges · Court AI · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Disclosure · Supervision · Training · Vendors | Policy | 2026-03-26 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | CNJ | Resolução CNJ nº 615/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence in the JudiciaryJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors | Regulation | 2026-03-25(+1) | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-STATEOklahoma | Oklahoma Supreme Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court Order Re: Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-03-23 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | CNB | Guide pratique — La déontologie et l'intelligence artificielleunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Billing · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-03-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew Mexico | New Mexico Supreme Court (Judge Thomson) | New Mexico Supreme Court Memorandum on AI Note-Taking ApplicationsunverifiedCourt AI · Evidence | Policy | 2026-03-16 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | ECRAI / Egypt NCAI | Guide to Egypt's National AI Governance Framework, Edition 2.0AI statute · Evidence · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-03-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | State Bar of California | Proposed amendments to Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.4, 1.6, 3.3, 5.1 and 5.3 related to artificial intelligence | Consultation | 2026-03-13 | 2026-09-21 | Proposed |
| INTL | LCIA | LCIA Arbitration Rules revision consultation (AI disclosure and guardrails)Arbitration · Disclosure | Consultation | 2026-03-11 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| OTHER | High Court of Kenya | High Court of Kenya rulings on AI-generated pleadings: Savla v Commission on Administrative Justice and the April 2026 set-asideunverifiedVerify · Litigants · Sanctions · Disclosure | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-03-06(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| SG | MinLaw | Guide for Using Generative AI in the Legal SectorBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Client consent · Supervision · Vendors · Evidence · Training | Guidance | 2026-03-06 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| US-FEDIllinois | N.D. Ill. (Fuentes) | Standing Order for Civil Cases (generative AI provision), Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. FuentesVerify | Standing order | 2026-03-04(+1) | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| OTHER | TBMM AI Research Commission | Report of the Parliamentary Research Commission on Artificial Intelligence, Report No. 260unverifiedAI statute · Data protection | Report | 2026-03-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDColorado | District of Colorado (Judge Kane) | Pretrial and Trial Procedures Memorandum for Civil CasesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-03-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHERCanary Islands | TSJ Canarias | TSJ Canarias, Criminal Chamber (Feb 2026): fine for 48 AI-fabricated Supreme Court citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-02-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Korea National Court Administration | AI Guidebook for JudgesunverifiedJudges · Verify · No AI deciding · Client data | Guidance | 2026-02-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| NZ | NZ Law Society | Generative AI guidance for lawyersBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Billing · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-02-24(+1) | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| OTHERSicily | Trib. Siracusa | Tribunale di Siracusa, Sez. II civ., judgment no. 338/2026 (AI-hallucinated citations, Art. 96 c.p.c.)unverifiedVerify · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-02-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (Judge Whitaker) | Standing Order Regarding the Use of AI in Judge Whitaker’s DivisionunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-02-20 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Kenyan Senate | The Artificial Intelligence Bill, 2026 (Senate Bills No. 4 of 2025)AI statute · Data protection | Statute | 2026-02-19 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (Judge Edwards) | 2026 Standing Case Management Order for Civil Cases in Judge Edwards’ Division: Use of Artificial Intelligence in the CourtroomunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-02-19 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | AEPD | AEPD Guidance on agentic AI from a data-protection perspective (Orientaciones sobre IA agentica)Data protection · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-02-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of the Philippines | A.M. No. 25-11-28-SC: Governance Framework on the Use of Human-Centered Augmented Intelligence in the JudiciaryDisclosure · Verify · Judges · No AI deciding · Litigants · Client data · Supervision · Court AI · Vendors · Training · Bar guidance | Court rule | 2026-02-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEOklahoma | Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals | Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 1.17 — Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2026-02-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | CJC | Consultation: The Use of AI for the Preparation of Court DocumentsDisclosure · Verify | Consultation | 2026-02-17 | 2026-09-21 | Consultation |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Cisneros) | Civil Standing Order for Magistrate Judge Lisa J. CisnerosunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-02-17 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEIndiana | Indiana Supreme Court OJA | Indiana Supreme Court Office of Judicial Administration: trial-court AI policy toolkitunverifiedJudges · Court AI | Policy | 2026-02-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida (Judge Chase) | Administrative Order No. 26-10: Disclosure of Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Attorneys and Self-Represented LitigantsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-02-13 | 2026-09-06 | Withdrawn |
| CAOntario | Ontario Superior Court | The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Court Proceedings (consolidated civil, family and criminal practice directions)Verify · Disclosure · Litigants · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-02-12 | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| OTHER | TRG | Tribunal da Relacao de Guimaraes, 10 Feb 2026: six non-existent appellate rulings generated by AIunverifiedVerify · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-02-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDGeorgia | Northern District of Georgia (Judge Grimberg) | Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-02-10 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 90th Judicial District Court of Texas (Judge Gregory) | 90th Judicial District Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Standing order | 2026-02-10 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Compliance tips for solicitors regarding the use of AI and technologyBar guidance · Competence · Supervision · Client data · Verify · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-02-09(+1) | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Texas Business Court, First Division (Judge Whitehill) | Judge Whitehill Guidelines: AI NotetakersunverifiedEvidence | Practice direction / note | 2026-02-05 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| INTL | IBA ANLBS | Guidelines and Regulations to Provide Insights on Public Policies to Ensure AI's Beneficial Use as a Professional ToolBar guidance · Consumer AI | Report | 2026-02-01(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Keulen) | Civil and Discovery Referral Matters Standing OrderunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-02-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEOregon | Oregon Circuit Court for Jackson County | Planning to Use Artificial Intelligence (AI): Read This FirstunverifiedLitigants | Guidance | 2026-02-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Judge Kearney) | Policies and Procedures: Requirements for Website References and Artificial Intelligence UseunverifiedVerify | Standing order | 2026-02-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | CGAE | CGAE White Paper on Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession (Libro Blanco sobre IA y Abogacia)unverifiedBar guidance · Training · Competence | Report | 2026-01-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CGPJ | CGPJ Instruction 2/2026 on the use of AI systems in judicial activity (Instruccion 2/2026)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Training · Data protection | Regulation | 2026-01-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDKansas | District of Kansas (Judge Broomes) | Standing Order 26-01 on Use of Artificial Intelligence in Preparing Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-01-28 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| EU | CJEU | Artificial Intelligence Ethics CharterJudges · Court AI · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data | Policy | 2026-01-26(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Korea National Assembly | Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust (Law No. 20676)unverifiedAI statute · Client consent · Evidence | Statute | 2026-01-22(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Lubbock County District Courts and County Courts at Law | Lubbock County Standing Order Regarding Children, Property, Conduct, and AI LiabilityunverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2026-01-22 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida (Judge Orshan) | Administrative Order No. 26-03: Prohibition on Use of Non-Approved Generative Artificial Intelligence Platforms by Court PersonnelunverifiedCourt AI | Standing order | 2026-01-15 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Taiwan Legislative Yuan | Artificial Intelligence Basic Act (Taiwan)AI statute · Evidence · Vendors | Statute | 2026-01-14(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Local Court | Practice Note: Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-12 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | Law Society of NSW | A Solicitor's Guide to Responsible Use of Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-01-09 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEColorado | Colorado Supreme Court | Colorado Rule Change 2026(02): AI amendments to the Colorado Rules of Professional ConductBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Billing · Supervision · Verify | Court rule | 2026-01-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Ho) | Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-01-08 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Ho) | Individual Rules and Practices in Criminal Cases: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-01-08 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Ho) | Individual Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-01-08 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| GULFQatar | QICDRC | Practice Direction No. 1 of 2026 and Practice Guidance on the Use of Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Jr.) | Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.unverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-01-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Personal Injury Commission | Procedural Direction PIC13: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-01 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| CASaskatchewan | Saskatchewan King's Bench | General Application Practice Directive #12: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court SubmissionsVerify · Litigants · Competence · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEArizona | Arizona Supreme Court | Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 2.5, Comment 1: judicial technology competenceunverifiedJudges · Competence | Court rule | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDColorado | District of Colorado (Judge Crews) | Standing Order for Civil CasesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | FL 17th Judicial Circuit | Florida 17th Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 2026-03-GEN: Use of AI in Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | Superseded |
| US-STATEMontana | MT 13th Judicial District Court | Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court Local Rule 35 — Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, Kings County, Civil Term (Judge Maslow) | Part 2 Rules: Artificial Intelligence ProgramsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Clarke) | Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure | Standing order | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEUtah | Utah Judicial Council | Utah Mediation Best Practice Guide: January 2026 - Generative AI UpdateunverifiedCourt AI | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| AUSouth Australia | SA Courts | Guidelines concerning the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in litigation in South Australian CourtsVerify · Litigants · Client data · Disclosure | Guidance | 2025-12-24 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NYC Bar | New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2025-6: Ethical Issues Affecting Use of AI to Record, Transcribe, and Summarize Conversations with ClientsBar guidance · Client data · Client consent · Verify | Ethics opinion | 2025-12-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CEPEJ | Guidelines on the use of generative AI by courts and tribunals (CEPEJ(2025)18Final)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Verify · Client data · Disclosure · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-12-19 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-FED | Advisory Committee on Civil Rules / Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure | Rules Suggestion 25-CV-S: Proposed Rule 11(a) Generative AI CertificationunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2025-12-16 | 2026-09-06 | Proposed |
| US-STATEHawaii | Hawaii Supreme Court | Hawaii Supreme Court Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: Final Report (SCMF-24-0000305)unverifiedDisclosure · Judges · Court AI · Verify | Report | 2025-12-16 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | Conseil d'État | Charte d'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle au sein de la juridiction administrativeJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Supervision | Policy | 2025-12-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENorth Carolina | Superior Court of Cabarrus County, North Carolina (Judge McGee) | Revised Administrative Order Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in the Superior Court of Cabarrus CountyunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants · Evidence | Standing order | 2025-12-08 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| INTL | UNESCO | UNESCO Guidelines for the use of AI systems in courts and tribunalsJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Training · Verify | Guidance | 2025-12-03(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERBeijing | Tongzhou District Court | Beijing Tongzhou District People's Court: counsel criticised for filing AI-fabricated precedentsVerify · Sanctions · Litigants | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Ústavní soud | Ústavní soud, usnesení sp. zn. I. ÚS 3004/25 — procedural fine for a constitutional complaint citing non-existent decisionsSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Finnish Bar Association | B 05.2 Data Security Manual [Tietoturvaopas], Annex 5 'AI guide for the advocate' [Tekoälyopas asianajajalle]Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Bar guidance · Training · Vendors · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-12-01(+2) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | HK Digital Policy Office | Hong Kong Generative AI Technical and Application GuidelineAI statute · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-12-01(+1) | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| HK | Law Society of Hong Kong | Circular 25-824: Generative AI in Legal Practice: Risks and TipsBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2025-12-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| OTHER | NOvA | Aanbevelingen AI in de advocatuurBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NY UCS AI Advisory Committee | Ethical Considerations and Recommendations for the Use of AI by Judges and Judicial Staff (2025 Annual Report) | Report | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEMassachusetts | Massachusetts SJC | Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Interim Guidelines for Use of Generative AIunverifiedJudges · Court AI · Client data | Guidance | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Denton County Probate Courts (Judge Judges) | Denton County Probate Courts Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Eastern District of Texas | Eastern District of Texas Local Rules CV-11(g) and AT-3(m) on Generative AIunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Court rule | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| UK | Bar Council | Considerations when using ChatGPT and generative AI software based on large language modelsBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2025-11-25(+1) | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| OTHER | KVKK | Generative AI and the Protection of Personal Data Guide, in 15 Questions (Üretken Yapay Zekâ ve Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Rehberi)Data protection · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-11-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEVirginia | Virginia State Bar | Legal Ethics Opinion 1901: Reasonable Fees and the Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedBilling · Bar guidance · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2025-11-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Drzavni zbor | Act implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on artificial intelligence (ZIUDHPUI)unverifiedAI statute · Data protection | Statute | 2025-11-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUWestern Australia | Supreme Court of WA | Guidelines for the use of generative AIVerify · Litigants · Client data · Evidence · Disclosure · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2025-11-20 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | Corte Suprema | Acta 244-2025: Judicial Ethics Code (article 17 on responsible use of technology and AI)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI | Guidance | 2025-11-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Southern District of California (Judge Latham) | Bankruptcy General Order No. 210: Filings Using Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2025-11-18 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (Judge Leftridge) | Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence and Certification of Citations in Judge Leftridge’s DivisionunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-11-17 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of the Philippines | A.M. No. 25-04-04-SC: The 2025 Code of Judicial Conduct and AccountabilityJudges · Verify · No AI deciding | Court rule | 2025-11-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CSJ Sala Civil | STC17832-2025: annulment of a judgment based on non-existent jurisprudential citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify · No AI deciding | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-11-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | MeitY | India AI Governance GuidelinesunverifiedAI statute · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-11-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Torres) | Individual Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedVerify | Standing order | 2025-11-05 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHERMadrid | ICAM | ICAM Guide of Good Practice for the use of AI in the legal profession (Guia ICAM IA 2025)Bar guidance · Client data · Client consent · Billing · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2025-10-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | UK Judiciary | Artificial Intelligence (AI): Judicial GuidanceJudges · No AI deciding · Client data · Verify · Court AI · Litigants | Guidance | 2025-10-31(+2) | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| US-STATEMontana | MT 4th Judicial District Court | Montana Fourth Judicial District Court Rules of Practice, Rule 3.G — Pleading Requirements for Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2025-10-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMaryland | Appellate Court of Maryland | Mezu v. Mezu, No. 361, Sept. Term 2025 (Appellate Court of Maryland, reported, 29 Oct 2025)Sanctions · Verify · Supervision · Disclosure | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-10-29 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Broderick) | Individual Rules & Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-10-29 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of the Philippines | A.M. No. 25-06-11-SC: The 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and PersonnelJudges · Verify · Court AI | Court rule | 2025-10-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEUtah | Utah Judicial Council | Utah Judicial Council Interim Rules on the Use of Generative AIJudges · Court AI · Vendors | Policy | 2025-10-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Congreso | Bill regulating artificial intelligence systems (Boletin 16821-19, merged with 15869-19)unverifiedAI statute | Statute | 2025-10-24(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| US-STATEIllinois | Illinois ARDC | ARDC: Implementing Generative AI for Illinois AttorneysBar guidance · Client data · Competence · Verify · Supervision · Client consent | Guidance | 2025-10-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York (Judge Cronan) | Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Artificial Intelligence ToolsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2025-10-23 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDOhio | S.D. Ohio (Graham) | Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham)Disclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2025-10-21 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-FEDSouth Dakota | District of South Dakota | Proposed Civil Local Rule 7.2 Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Court rule | 2025-10-20 | 2026-09-06 | Proposed |
| US-FEDSouth Dakota | District of South Dakota | Proposed Criminal Local Rule 12.2 Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Court rule | 2025-10-20 | 2026-09-06 | Proposed |
| US-STATETexas | Denton County District Courts (Judge Judges) | Denton County District Courts Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-10-16 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | CSJN | Acordada 10/2025: AI-generated plain-language summaries of judgments (LEX100)Court AI | Court rule | 2025-10-15 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | CNF | CNF communication to local bars with model client notice on AI use (Art. 13 Law 132/2025)Client consent · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2025-10-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Malta (MDIA Act) | Artificial Intelligence Regulations, 2025 (Subsidiary Legislation 591.05)AI statute · Data protection | Regulation | 2025-10-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NY Unified Court System | Interim Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence | Policy | 2025-10-10 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| EU | CCBE | CCBE Guide on the use of generative AI by lawyersBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-10-02 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| OTHER | House of Representatives | House Bill No. 3462 (20th Congress): creating the Philippine Artificial Intelligence CommissionAI statute | Statute | 2025-10-02 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHERRio Negro | STJ Rio Negro | Acordada 15/2024 and October 2025 extension: Protocol of Good Practice for Generative AI in the Judiciary of Rio NegroJudges · Verify · Sanctions · No AI deciding | Court rule | 2025-10-01(+1) | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| US-STATELouisiana | Louisiana Technology Commission | Louisiana Supreme Court Technology Commission: Generative Artificial Intelligence GuidelinesunverifiedJudges · Bar guidance · Client data · Verify · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-10-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDMinnesota | District of Minnesota | GenAI FAQunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Guidance | 2025-10-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| CA | Federal Court of Canada | Interim Principles and Guidelines on the Court's Use of Artificial IntelligenceCourt AI · Judges · No AI deciding · Client data | Guidance | 2025-09-29 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| OTHER | Parliament (IT) | Law 23 September 2025 no. 132 on artificial intelligence (Legge 132/2025)Client consent · Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · AI statute · Training · Vendors · Competence | Statute | 2025-09-25 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Supreme Court of Queensland | Practice Direction Number 5 of 2025: Accuracy of References in SubmissionsDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions · Litigants · Competence | Practice direction / note | 2025-09-24 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| US-STATEIdaho | Idaho OAH | Idaho Office of Administrative Hearings: Guidelines for Administrative Law Judges Regarding the Use of Artificial IntelligenceJudges · Disclosure · Client data · Court AI · Evidence | Guidance | 2025-09-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | ÖRAK | Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) in Anwaltskanzleien — Leitfaden und Checkliste für KI-DienstleisterBar guidance · Vendors · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Training · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-09-23 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Queensland Courts | The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Guidelines for Responsible Use by Non-LawyersLitigants · Verify · Client data | Guidance | 2025-09-15(+1) | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-FEDConnecticut | District of Connecticut | Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted ResearchunverifiedLitigants | Guidance | 2025-09-12 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Congreso | Ley 31814: Law promoting the use of artificial intelligence for the country's economic and social developmentAI statute | Statute | 2025-09-09(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEPennsylvania | Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania | Interim Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Judicial Officers and Court PersonnelunverifiedCourt AI | Policy | 2025-09-09 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| INTL | Ciarb | Ciarb Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration (2025)Arbitration · Disclosure · Verify · Evidence · No AI deciding · Client data · Sanctions · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-09-05(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Advokatforeningen | Veiledning for bruk av kunstig intelligens i advokatvirksomhetunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-09-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAQuebec | Quebec Superior Court | Cadre de gouvernance en matière d'intelligence artificielle [Artificial Intelligence Governance Framework]unverifiedCourt AI · Judges · No AI deciding · Vendors | Policy | 2025-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | Judicial Council of California | California Rule of Court 10.430 and Standard 10.80: Generative AI use by courts | Court rule | 2025-09-01 | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| OTHER | JFBA | Points of Attention on the Use of Generative AI in Attorney Practice: Five Points for Appropriate UseunverifiedBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Client consent | Guidance | 2025-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | California Judicial Branch | California Standard of Judicial Administration 10.80: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Judicial OfficersunverifiedDisclosure · Court AI | Policy | 2025-09-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDOhio | Southern District of Ohio (Judge Newman) | Standing Order Governing Civil CasesunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants · No AI deciding | Standing order | 2025-08-27 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDOhio | Southern District of Ohio (Judge Newman) | Standing Order Governing Criminal CasesunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants · No AI deciding | Standing order | 2025-08-27 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Mexican federal collegiate court | Federal collegiate court criteria on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial decision-makingunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-08-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDOhio | Southern District of Ohio (Judge Hopkins) | Standing Order Governing the Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-08-20 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Thompson) | Standing Order on Civility and ProfessionalismunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2025-08-18 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Hays County Courts at Law | Hays County Courts at Law Local Rule 1.07 Certification Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Court rule | 2025-08-13 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Judiciary of Kenya | Draft Judiciary Artificial Intelligence Policy and draft Practice Directions on AI use in courtsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI | Policy | 2025-08-11 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-FED | DOJ EOIR | Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR ProceedingsBar guidance · Disclosure · Sanctions · Verify · Judges | Policy | 2025-08-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERSanta Fe | Camara Rosario | Camara de Apelacion en lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario, Sala II, Giacomino c/ Monserrat: AI-fabricated citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-08-01 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | Ministère de la Justice | L'IA au service de la justice : stratégie et solutions opérationnellesunverifiedCourt AI · Judges · Training · Vendors | Report | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATELouisiana | Louisiana Legislature | Louisiana Act No. 250 of 2025: verification and disclosure of AI-generated or falsified evidence (La. C.C.P. art. 371)Evidence · Disclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Statute | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | AO of the US Courts | Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciaryJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Verify | Guidance | 2025-07-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | United States Court of International Trade (Judge Kelly) | Order on Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Client data | Standing order | 2025-07-24 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FED | United States Court of International Trade (Judge Restani) | Order on Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Client data | Standing order | 2025-07-24 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (Judge Benton) | Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence and Certification of Citations in Judge Benton’s DivisionunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-07-24 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| INKerala | Kerala High Court | Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District JudiciaryunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Vendors | Policy | 2025-07-19 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Guidelines on the scope of obligations for providers of general-purpose AI modelsAI statute · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-07-18 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| BR | CAM-CCBC | Orientacao Administrativa no 07/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in ArbitrationsArbitration | Guidance | 2025-07-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Northern District of California (Judge Kang) | Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Magistrate Judge Peter H. KangunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Standing order | 2025-07-16 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHERCiudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | CPACF | Guide for the use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers (Guia para el uso de Inteligencia Artificial para Abogados)Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence | Guidance | 2025-07-11 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (Judge Sr.) | Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence and Certification of Citations in Judge Schwall’s DivisionunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-07-11 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| EU | EU AI Office | General-Purpose AI Code of PracticeAI statute · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-07-10 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| OTHER | Malaysian Bar | Circular No. 242/2025: Updates on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Legal PracticeBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Vendors · Training · Consumer AI | Guidance | 2025-07-03 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | United States Court of International Trade (Judge Choe-Groves) | Standing Order on the Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-07-03 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Judicial Council of Georgia | Judicial Council of Georgia Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: ReportJudges · Disclosure · Court AI | Report | 2025-07-03 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Senate of the Philippines | Senate Bill No. 25 (20th Congress): An Act Regulating the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence SystemsAI statute | Statute | 2025-07-02 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| US-FEDCalifornia | Central District of California (Judge Olguin) | Initial Standing OrderunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-07-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Southern District of Texas (Judge Kazen) | Judge John A. Kazen Court Procedures in Criminal Cases Section 7unverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2025-06-23 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Swedish Bar Association | Vägledning om användning av generativ AI i advokatverksamhetBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2025-06-12(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMichigan | State Bar of Michigan | State Bar of Michigan AI Workgroup: Transforming the Legal Profession in the Age of AIunverifiedBar guidance · Competence · Consumer AI | Report | 2025-06-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CEPEJ | Assessment Tool for the operationalisation of the European Ethical Charter on the use of AI in judicial systems (CEPEJ(2023)16)unverifiedCourt AI · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-06-05(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEArkansas | Arkansas Supreme Court | Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 25: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedJudges · Client data · Court AI | Standing order | 2025-06-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEArkansas | Arkansas Supreme Court | In re Amendments to the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct (AI amendments), 2025 Ark. 115unverifiedBar guidance · Supervision · Verify | Court rule | 2025-06-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Japan Diet | Act on the Promotion of Research, Development and Utilisation of AI-Related Technology (Law No. 53 of 2025)AI statute | Statute | 2025-06-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | STJ | STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve JuizadounverifiedConsumer AI · Litigants | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-06-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Norwegian Ministry of Digitalisation | Høring — utkast til ny lov om kunstig intelligens (implementation of the EU AI Act in Norwegian law)unverifiedAI statute | Consultation | 2025-06-01 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-FEDAlabama | Northern District of Alabama (Judge Axon) | Initial Order Governing All Further Proceedings: Disclosure of Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-05-23 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| GULF | iGA (Bahrain) | General Policy for the Use of Artificial Intelligence, Version 1.0Court AI · Vendors · Data protection · No AI deciding · Training | Policy | 2025-05-20 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | Denmark | Lov om supplerende bestemmelser til forordningen om kunstig intelligens (LOV nr 467 af 14/05/2025)AI statute · Court AI · Judges | Statute | 2025-05-14(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDWyoming | District of Wyoming | General Order No. 25-01 Concerning the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Preparation of FilingsunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-05-13 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDNew Mexico | District of New Mexico (Judge Gonzales) | District of New Mexico Bulletin on Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedLitigants | Guidance | 2025-05-09 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Southern District of Texas (Judge Crane) | General Order 2025-04 on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2025-05-07 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEVirginia | Supreme Court of Virginia | Supreme Court of Virginia Rules for Generative AI UseunverifiedClient data · Court AI | Policy | 2025-05-07 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | AI literacy (Article 4 AI Act): Questions and answersAI statute · Training · Competence | Guidance | 2025-05-01 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| US-STATEMaryland | MSBA | MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force: Ethical Considerations for Attorney Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedBar guidance · Client data · Billing · Competence · Verify · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-05-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Southern District of Texas (Judge Marmolejo) | Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo Civil Court Procedures Section 8unverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2025-05-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| IL | Israel Privacy Protection Authority | Draft Guidelines on the Application of the Privacy Protection Law to Artificial Intelligence SystemsunverifiedData protection · Client data · Vendors | Consultation | 2025-04-30 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-STATEGuam | Supreme Court of Guam | Administrative Order No. ADM25-001 Adopting the Judiciary of Guam Policy on Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Client data · Litigants · Court AI | Standing order | 2025-04-30 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEAlaska | Alaska Bar Association | Alaska Bar Association Ethics Opinion 2025-1: Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of LawBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2025-04-23 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERJujuy | STJ Jujuy | Acordada 31/2025: Judicial Innovation Laboratory and Protocol for the use of AI in the Judiciary of JujuyJudges · Court AI | Court rule | 2025-04-11 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| INTL | VIAC | VIAC Note on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration ProceedingsArbitration · No AI deciding · Client data · Evidence · Competence · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-04-09 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of Pakistan | Ishfaq Ahmed v Mushtaq Ahmed, 2025 SCP 112 (PLD 2025 SC 582)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Court AI · Arbitration | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-04-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | Seventeenth Judicial Circuit of Florida | Administrative Order 2024-26-Civ (Amendment 2) with Civil Case Management ExhibitsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-04-08 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHERSanta Fe | CSJ Santa Fe | Circular No. 25: Good-practice guide for the use of generative AI in the Judiciary of Santa FeJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI | Guidance | 2025-04-04 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | KIRP | AI w pracy radcy prawnego — Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania przez radców prawnych z narzędzi opartych na sztucznej inteligencjiBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Billing · Vendors · Training · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | PCPD | Checklist on Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI by EmployeesData protection · Client data · Supervision · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-03-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | SAK | Rules on the use of AI tools in advocacy practice (SAK Presidium Resolution 12/4/2025, as amended by 21/14/2025)Bar guidance · Client data · Verify · Client consent · Competence · Supervision · Training · Vendors · Billing | Regulation | 2025-03-31(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | MICDE | Kenya Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025-2030AI statute | Policy | 2025-03-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATESouth Carolina | Supreme Court of South Carolina (Judge Kittredge) | Interim Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedCourt AI | Policy | 2025-03-25 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FED | United States Court of International Trade | Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Practice Before the CourtunverifiedDisclosure | Guidance | 2025-03-21 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | NDPC | Nigeria Data Protection Act General Application and Implementation Directive (GAID) 2025 — Articles 43 and 44 (Emerging Technologies)Data protection · Vendors | Regulation | 2025-03-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 21st and 335th Judicial District Courts of Texas (Judge Winkelmann) | 21st and 335th Judicial District Courts Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-03-19 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | CNDP (Morocco) | Communiqué de presse — IA et protection des données à caractère personnelData protection | Guidance | 2025-03-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Court of Appeal | AI Use in Appeal ProceedingsunverifiedVerify · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2025-03-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERTuscany | Trib. Firenze | Tribunale di Firenze, Sezione Imprese, order of 14 March 2025 (ChatGPT-invented Cassazione citations)unverifiedVerify · Supervision · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-03-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NCAT | NCAT Procedural Direction 7: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI)Disclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2025-03-07 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | CAC | Measures for Labelling AI-Generated and Synthesised ContentEvidence · AI statute | Regulation | 2025-03-07 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUWestern Australia | Supreme Court of WA | Artificial Intelligence practice direction: Consultation noteBar guidance · Verify · Judges | Consultation | 2025-03-03 | 2026-09-04 | Superseded |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Judge Scott) | Standing Order Re: Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge ScottunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2025-03-03 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| INTL | AAA-ICDR | AAA-ICDR Guidance on Arbitrators' Use of AI ToolsunverifiedArbitration · Verify · Client data · No AI deciding · Competence · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-03-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAAlberta | Law Society of Alberta | Gen AI Rules of Engagement for Canadian LawyersBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2025-03-01(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Supreme Court | Ensuring the Integrity of Court Submissions When Using Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedVerify · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2025-02-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMichigan | State Bar of Michigan | State Bar of Michigan: AI FAQs for AttorneysunverifiedBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Guidance | 2025-02-11(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Commission Guidelines on prohibited artificial intelligence practices (Article 5 AI Act)AI statute | Guidance | 2025-02-04 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| OTHER | OVB / Avocats.be | Richtlijnen voor advocaten voor het gebruik van Artificiële Intelligentie (OVB/Avocats.be guidelines on AI for lawyers)Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Vendors · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-02-01 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | Korea Judicial AI Research Group | Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary (Judicial AI Research Group)unverifiedDisclosure · Evidence · Judges | Report | 2025-02-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEOregon | Oregon State Bar | Oregon State Bar Formal Opinion 2025-205: Artificial Intelligence Tools | Ethics opinion | 2025-02-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | State Bar of Texas | Opinion 705: Generative Artificial Intelligence | Ethics opinion | 2025-02-01 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Grayson County District Courts and County Courts at Law | Grayson County Local Rules on Artificial Intelligence in Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Court rule | 2025-01-31 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEArizona | Arizona Supreme Court | Arizona Code of Judicial Administration 1-509: Use of Generative AI Technology and Large Language Models | Court rule | 2025-01-29(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Supreme Court | Practice Note SC Gen 23: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2025-01-28(+1) | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| AU | OAIC | Guidance on privacy and the use of commercially available AI productsData protection · Vendors · Client data | Guidance | 2025-01-17(+1) | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | Egypt NCAI | Egypt National Artificial Intelligence Strategy, Second Edition (2025-2030)Court AI · Judges | Policy | 2025-01-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Ministry of Justice (HR) | Rulebook on the anonymisation, publication and search of anonymised court decisions (NN 124/24)unverifiedCourt AI · Data protection | Regulation | 2025-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Supreme Court, Erie County (Judge Weinmann) | IAS Rules: A.I.unverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2025-01-01 | 2026-09-06 | Superseded |
| US-STATEColorado | Colorado Court of Appeals | Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstone, LLC, 2024 COA 128 (Colo. Ct. App. 26 Dec 2024)Sanctions · Verify · Disclosure | Judgment (guidance) | 2024-12-26 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NPC Philippines | NPC Advisory No. 2024-04: Application of the Data Privacy Act to AI Systems Processing Personal DataData protection · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-12-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Illinois Supreme Court | Illinois Supreme Court Policy on Artificial Intelligence | Policy | 2024-12-18 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| OTHER | Danske Advokater | To nye AI-vejledninger til advokatbranchen (AI Act guidance and AI procurement guidance)unverifiedBar guidance · Vendors · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2024-12-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | EDPB | Opinion 28/2024 on certain data protection aspects related to the processing of personal data in the context of AI modelsData protection · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-12-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CSJ | Acuerdo PCSJA24-12243: Guidelines for the respectful, responsible, safe and ethical use of AI in the Judicial BranchJudges · No AI deciding · Client data · Court AI · Training · Vendors | Regulation | 2024-12-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | Congresso Nacional | PL 2338/2023: Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence (Marco Legal da IA)AI statute | Statute | 2024-12-10(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| AU | VLSB+C / LS NSW / LPBWA | Statement on the use of artificial intelligence in Australian legal practiceBar guidance · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Billing | Guidance | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 109th Judicial District Court of Texas (Judge Pool) | 109th Judicial District Court Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Estonian Bar Association | AI guide for advocates [Tehisaru juhend advokaatidele]unverifiedVerify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Bar guidance · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-12-03 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York Integrated Domestic Violence Court, New York County (Judge Dawson) | Integrated Domestic Violence Court Rules: Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-12-03 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | BRAK | Hinweise zum Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz (KI)Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors · AI statute · Training | Guidance | 2024-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAOntario | Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure | Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4.06.1(2.1) and (2.2): Certification of authenticity of authorities (O. Reg. 384/24)Disclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2024-12-01 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Chief Justice | Guidelines for New South Wales Judges in respect of use of Generative AIJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Supervision · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-11-21 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| US-STATEArizona | Arizona AI Steering Committee | Arizona Steering Committee on AI and the Courts: Generative AI — Ethical Best Practices for Lawyers and JudgesunverifiedBar guidance · Judges · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Client consent | Guidance | 2024-11-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMississippi | Mississippi Bar | Mississippi Bar Ethics Opinion No. 267: lawyers' use of generative artificial intelligenceunverifiedBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2024-11-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | OAB | Recomendacao no 001/2024: Responsible Use of Generative AI in Legal PracticeunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence | Guidance | 2024-11-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | ANPD | ANPD call for input on Artificial Intelligence and Review of Automated Decisions (LGPD art. 20)Data protection | Consultation | 2024-11-06 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-STATENorth Carolina | North Carolina State Bar | 2024 Formal Ethics Opinion 1: Use of Artificial Intelligence in a Law Practice | Ethics opinion | 2024-11-01 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| CAQuebec | Barreau du Québec | L'intelligence artificielle générative: Guide pratique pour une utilisation responsableBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-10-25 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Judicial Council of Georgia (Judge Boggs) | Judicial Council Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the CourtsunverifiedCourt AI | Standing order | 2024-10-22 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEDelaware | Delaware Supreme Court | Interim Policy on the Use of Generative AI by Judicial Officers and Court Personnel | Policy | 2024-10-21 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| US-FEDColorado | District of Colorado (Judge Prose) | Standing Order Requiring Certification Re: Use of Artificial Intelligence in FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2024-10-21 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEDelaware | Delaware Judiciary | Order Adopting Interim Policy on the Use of GenAI by Judicial Officers and Court PersonnelunverifiedCourt AI | Standing order | 2024-10-21 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| INTL | SCC | SCC Guide to the use of artificial intelligence in cases administered under the SCC RulesArbitration · No AI deciding · Evidence · Vendors · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-10-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Registrar in Bankruptcy | Artificial Intelligence Directive, Registrar in BankruptcyunverifiedDisclosure | Practice direction / note | 2024-10-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | IL 22nd Judicial Circuit | Illinois 22nd Judicial Circuit (McHenry County) Administrative Order 2024-23: Artificial Intelligence Policy and PlanunverifiedDisclosure · Judges · Court AI | Standing order | 2024-10-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDNew York | Southern District of New York | Local Bankruptcy Rule 9011-1: Signing of PapersunverifiedVerify | Court rule | 2024-09-30 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew Mexico | State Bar of New Mexico | Formal Ethics Advisory Opinion 2024-004: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of LawBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Supervision | Ethics opinion | 2024-09-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| SG | Singapore Courts | Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024: Guide on the Use of Generative AI Tools by Court UsersDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2024-09-23 | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| INTL | IBA/CAIDP | The Future is Now: Artificial Intelligence and the Legal ProfessionBar guidance · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Training | Report | 2024-09-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | AAIP | Guide for public and private entities on transparency and personal-data protection for responsible AIunverifiedData protection | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| CA | CJC | Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Canadian CourtsunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Training | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CNB | Guide pratique — Utilisation des systèmes d'intelligence artificielle générativeBar guidance · Competence · Verify · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | MOSTI | National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics (AIGE)AI statute | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMinnesota | Minnesota OLPR | Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility: ethics guidance for generative AI useunverifiedBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Competence · Client consent | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NBA-SLP | Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession in NigeriaBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-08-28(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | SIC | Circular Externa 002 de 2024: Guidelines on the processing of personal data in AI systemsunverifiedData protection | Regulation | 2024-08-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NYC Bar | New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2024-5: Generative Artificial Intelligence | Ethics opinion | 2024-08-07 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| OTHER | Corte Constitucional | Sentencia T-323 de 2024: due process and judges' use of generative AI (ChatGPT)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2024-08-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | FMCIDE / NITDA-NCAIR | National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (NAIS), August 2024AI statute | Policy | 2024-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| GULF | UAE AI Office | The UAE Charter for the Development and Use of Artificial IntelligenceAI statute · Court AI · Data protection | Policy | 2024-07-30 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| US-FED | ABA | ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence ToolsBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Client consent · Verify · Supervision · Billing · Vendors | Ethics opinion | 2024-07-29 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Gray County Court (Judge Porter) | Gray County Court Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-07-17 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Supreme Court of Queensland | Practice Direction Number 14 of 2024: Expert evidence in criminal proceedings (other than sentences)Evidence · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2024-07-15 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Hudspeth County Court (Judge MacKenzie) | Hudspeth County Court Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-07-12 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDAlabama | Northern District of Alabama (Judge Haikala) | Haikala Chambers Initial Order: Use of AI to Create Court SubmissionsunverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2024-07-08 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | Collin County Courts at Law (Judge County) | Collin County Courts at Law Standing Order No. 3: Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-07-03 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| HK | Hong Kong Judiciary | Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Judges, Judicial Officers and Support StaffJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-07-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-STATEMinnesota | Minnesota State Bar Association | Minnesota State Bar Association AI Working Group: Final Report and RecommendationsunverifiedBar guidance · Competence · Client data | Report | 2024-07-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMissouri | MO 7th Judicial Circuit | Missouri 7th Judicial Circuit (Clay County) Local Rule 3.3.1: Disclosure of Artificial Intelligence UseunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2024-07-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 21st, 335th, 423rd, and 465th District Courts of Bastrop County (Judge Beyer) | Bastrop County District Courts Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-07-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | TBMM | Artificial Intelligence Bill [Yapay Zekâ Kanunu Teklifi]AI statute | Statute | 2024-06-25 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | SAV/FSA | SAV-Wegleitung für den Umgang mit künstlicher IntelligenzBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Vendors · Supervision · AI statute | Guidance | 2024-06-14(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | JAMS | JAMS Rules Governing Disputes Involving Artificial Intelligence SystemsArbitration · Evidence | Court rule | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEKansas | Shawnee County District Court | Shawnee County District Court Rule 3.125: Pleadings Using Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEWest Virginia | WV Lawyer Disciplinary Board | Legal Ethics Opinion 24-01: Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Ethics opinion | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | PCPD | Artificial Intelligence: Model Personal Data Protection FrameworkData protection · Vendors · Client data | Guidance | 2024-06-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IE | Judicial Council of Ireland | Guidelines for Judges: The Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI | Guidance | 2024-06-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-FED | Fifth Circuit | Proposed amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 (generative AI certification)Disclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2024-06-01 | 2026-09-03 | Withdrawn |
| AUQueensland | QLS | Guidance Statement No. 37: Artificial Intelligence in Legal PracticeBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Verify · Supervision · Vendors · Client consent | Guidance | 2024-05-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division (Judge Ramos) | Law Division Standing OrderunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2024-05-30 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEPennsylvania | PBA and Philadelphia Bar | Joint Formal Opinion 2024-200: Ethical Issues Regarding the Use of Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2024-05-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew Hampshire | NH Bar Association | Ethics of Using Artificial Intelligence in Practice (NHBA Ethics Corner)Bar guidance · Client data · Verify · Competence | Guidance | 2024-05-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Judge Hodge) | Civil Procedures: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedLitigants | Standing order | 2024-05-10 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| CA | Federal Court of Canada | Notice to the Parties and the Profession: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court ProceedingsDisclosure · Verify | Practice direction / note | 2024-05-07(+1) | 2026-09-11 | In force |
| IL | Israel Bar National Ethics Committee | Preliminary Opinion on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Lawyers' Work, decision At/60/24unverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence · Disclosure · Vendors | Ethics opinion | 2024-05-07 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | DSK | Orientierungshilfe: Künstliche Intelligenz und DatenschutzData protection · No AI deciding · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-05-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | OECD | OECD Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449)AI statute | Policy | 2024-05-03(+2) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Judge Pratter) | Standing Order Regarding Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge PratterunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-05-03 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Queensland Courts | The use of generative AI: guidelines for judicial officersJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Verify · Client data · Supervision | Guidance | 2024-05-01 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| AUVictoria | Supreme Court of Victoria | Guidelines for Litigants: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in LitigationLitigants · Verify · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-05-01 | 2026-09-03 | Superseded |
| INTL | SVAMC | SVAMC Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration (First Edition)Arbitration · Disclosure · Verify · Client data · Evidence · No AI deciding · Competence | Guidance | 2024-04-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMissouri | Missouri OLEC | Missouri Informal Opinion 2024-11: lawyer's use of generative artificial intelligenceBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Ethics opinion | 2024-04-25 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEHawaii | Supreme Court of Hawaii | Order Establishing the Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the CourtsunverifiedCourt AI | Standing order | 2024-04-16 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FED | United States Patent and Trademark Office, including PTAB and TTAB (Judge Vidal) | Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Policy | 2024-04-11 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FED | USPTO | Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the USPTOVerify · Client data · Competence · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2024-04-11 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NYSBA | Report and Recommendations of the New York State Bar Association Task Force on Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Client consent · Supervision · Verify · Billing · Consumer AI | Report | 2024-04-06 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| CAManitoba | Law Society of Manitoba | Generative Artificial Intelligence: Guidelines for Use in the Practice of LawBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision | Guidance | 2024-04-01 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| CAOntario | LSO | White Paper: Licensee Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision | Guidance | 2024-04-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-STATEDistrict of Columbia | D.C. Bar | D.C. Bar Legal Ethics Opinion 388: Attorneys' Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Client MattersBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Ethics opinion | 2024-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | 30th District Court of Wichita County (Judge McKnight) | 30th District Court of Wichita County Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Standing order | 2024-03-26 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATEKentucky | Kentucky Bar Association | KBA E-457: The Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law | Ethics opinion | 2024-03-15 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| SG | PDPC | Advisory Guidelines on Use of Personal Data in AI Recommendation and Decision SystemsData protection · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-03-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, USPTO (Judge Vidal) | The Applicability of Existing Regulations as to Party and Practitioner Misconduct Related to the Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Policy | 2024-02-06 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| CASaskatchewan | Law Society of Saskatchewan | Guidelines for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of LawunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision | Guidance | 2024-02-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CEPEJ | Information note on the use of generative AI by judicial professionalsJudges · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2024-02-01 | 2026-09-03 | Superseded |
| US-STATEConnecticut | Connecticut Judicial Branch | Responsible AI Policy Framework v2.1 | Policy | 2024-02-01 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York State Supreme Court, Westchester County (Judge Zuckerman) | Part Rules: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Standing order | 2024-02-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATENew Jersey | New Jersey Supreme Court | Preliminary Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by New Jersey Lawyersunverified | Guidance | 2024-01-24 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATENew Jersey | Supreme Court of New Jersey (Judge Rabner) | Notice to the Bar: Preliminary Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by New Jersey LawyersunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Guidance | 2024-01-24 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-STATELouisiana | Louisiana Supreme Court | Louisiana Supreme Court letter to the Louisiana State Bar Association on the emergence of artificial intelligenceBar guidance · Judges · Disclosure · Client data · Verify · Competence | Guidance | 2024-01-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | Florida Bar | Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 24-1: Lawyers' use of generative artificial intelligence | Ethics opinion | 2024-01-19 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| GULF | SDAIA | Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines for GovernmentunverifiedCourt AI · Verify · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-01-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULF | SDAIA | Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines for the PublicunverifiedVerify · AI statute · Litigants | Guidance | 2024-01-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Finnish Bar Association | B 05.1 Data Security Guideline [Tietoturvaohje]Client data · Competence · Client consent · Vendors · Training | Regulation | 2024-01-01(+2) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULFDubai International Financial Centre | DIFC Courts | Practical Guidance Note No. 2 of 2023: large language models and generative AI in DIFC Courts proceedingsDisclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2023-12-21 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| OTHER | Gobierno de Espana | Royal Decree-Law 6/2023: automated, proactive and assisted actions in the Administration of JusticeCourt AI · No AI deciding | Statute | 2023-12-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Komdigi | Circular Letter No. 9 of 2023 on Artificial Intelligence Ethics [SE Menkominfo No. 9/2023 Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial]AI statute · Data protection | Policy | 2023-12-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | New York State Supreme Court, Westchester County (Judge Blackwood) | Part Rules: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Litigants | Standing order | 2023-12-13 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDMichigan | Eastern District of Michigan | Notice of Proposed Amendments to Local RulesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2023-12-08 | 2026-09-06 | Proposed |
| NZ | Courts of New Zealand | Guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in Courts and TribunalsJudges · Verify · Client data · Litigants · Evidence · Court AI · Supervision · Disclosure | Guidance | 2023-12-07 | 2026-09-21 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NSBS | Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law: What is AI and can or should I use it in my practice?unverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CCJE | CCJE Opinion No. 26 (2023): Moving forward - the use of assistive technology in the judiciaryJudges · No AI deciding · Training | Guidance | 2023-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Northern District of Texas (Judge Kacsmaryk) | Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements for Judge Matthew J. KacsmarykunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2023-11-27 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Bar Council Malaysia | Circular No. 342/2023: Risks and Precautions in Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Legal ProfessionBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-11-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEColorado | Colorado OPDJ | People v. Zachariah C. Crabill, 23PDJ067 (Colo. O.P.D.J. 22 Nov 2023)Sanctions · Verify · Competence | Judgment (guidance) | 2023-11-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Risk Outlook report: The use of artificial intelligence in the legal marketBar guidance · Verify · Client data | Report | 2023-11-20 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| US-FEDHawaii | District of Hawaii | General Order 23-1: In Re Use of Unverified SourcesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2023-11-14 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| CABritish Columbia | LSBC | Guidance on Professional Responsibility and Generative AIBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-11-01 | 2026-10-05 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Provincial Court | Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Protecting the Integrity of Court Submissions in Provincial CourtunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2023-10-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMichigan | State Bar of Michigan | State Bar of Michigan Judicial Ethics Opinion JI-155: judicial use of artificial intelligenceunverifiedJudges · Competence · Court AI | Ethics opinion | 2023-10-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEWest Virginia | WV Judicial Investigation Commission | JIC Advisory Opinion 2023-22 (judicial use of artificial intelligence)Judges · Verify · Client data | Ethics opinion | 2023-10-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANewfoundland and Labrador | NL Supreme Court | Notice to the Profession and General Public: Ensuring the Integrity of Court Submissions when Using Large Language ModelsunverifiedVerify · Litigants · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-10-12 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAAlberta | Alberta Courts | Notice to the Profession and Public: Ensuring the Integrity of Court Submissions When Using Large Language ModelsVerify · Litigants · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-10-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDOklahoma | Eastern District of Oklahoma (Judge Robertson) | Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2023-09-27 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| NZ | NZ Privacy Commissioner | Artificial Intelligence and the Information Privacy PrinciplesData protection · Vendors · Client data | Guidance | 2023-09-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | ČAK | Stanovisko k užívání umělé inteligence (AI) při poskytování právních služebBar guidance · Client data · Client consent · Verify · Consumer AI | Ethics opinion | 2023-09-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULFDubai International Financial Centre | DIFC Commissioner of Data Protection | DIFC Data Protection Regulations, Regulation 10 — Processing Personal Data through Autonomous and Semi-autonomous SystemsData protection · Vendors · AI statute | Regulation | 2023-09-01 | 2026-10-07 | In force |
| GULF | SDAIA | AI Ethics PrinciplesunverifiedAI statute · Data protection · Court AI | Policy | 2023-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDOklahoma | Western District of Oklahoma (Judge Palk) | Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Standing order | 2023-09-01 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | Judicial Yuan | Judicial Yuan statement on generative-AI judgment drafting for criminal casesCourt AI · No AI deciding · Judges | Policy | 2023-08-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Japan MoJ | Relationship between AI-based contract-drafting, review and management support services and Article 72 of the Attorney ActConsumer AI | Guidance | 2023-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDOklahoma | Western District of Oklahoma | General Order 23-01: Pleadings Using Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Client data · Litigants | Standing order | 2023-07-25 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| OTHER | CAC | Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence ServicesAI statute · Data protection | Regulation | 2023-07-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAYukon | Supreme Court of Yukon | Practice Direction GENERAL-29: Use of Artificial Intelligence ToolsDisclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-06-26 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAManitoba | Manitoba King's Bench | Practice Direction: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court SubmissionsDisclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-06-23 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | Northern District of Texas | General Order 2023-03: Pleadings Using Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedVerify · Litigants | Standing order | 2023-06-21 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FED | United States Court of International Trade (Judge Vaden) | Order on Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Client data | Standing order | 2023-06-08 | 2026-09-06 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | E.D. Pa. (Baylson) | Standing Order Re: Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge BaylsonDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2023-06-06 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| OTHER | Japan PPC | Alert on the use of generative AI servicesData protection · Client data | Guidance | 2023-06-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | N.D. Tex. (Starr) | Mandatory Certification Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge Brantley Starr)Disclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2023-05-30 | 2026-09-16 | In force |
| OTHER | Egypt NCAI / MCIT | Egyptian Charter for Responsible AI, 2023 v1.0AI statute | Guidance | 2023-04-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANewfoundland and Labrador | LSNL | Artificial Intelligence in Your PracticeBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-03-07 | 2026-09-22 | In force |
| INTL | UNESCO | UNESCO Global Toolkit on AI and the Rule of Law for the JudiciaryunverifiedTraining · Judges | Guidance | 2023-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | SPC | Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial FieldJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors | Policy | 2022-12-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | PCPD | Guidance on the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedData protection · Vendors | Guidance | 2021-08-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | CNJ | Resolucao CNJ no 332/2020: Ethics, Transparency and Governance in the Production and Use of AI in the JudiciaryunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors | Regulation | 2020-08-21 | 2026-09-04 | Superseded |
| INTL | CEPEJ | European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environmentJudges · Court AI · No AI deciding · Vendors | Guidance | 2018-12-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
US-STATE
IN
UK
IE
EU
ZA
INTL
CA
BR
AU
SG
IL
NZ
GULF
HKMissing a document, or a newer version? Tell us. Entries are checked against the official publication; the ones we could not open directly are marked unverified until they are.