Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Pretrial and Trial Procedures Memorandum for Civil Cases
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge John L. Kane · Colorado
last revised 2026-03-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge John L. Kane’s revised District of Colorado civil pretrial and trial procedures require a certification in every filing prepared in whole or part with generative AI. The certification identifies AI-prepared portions, confirms human accuracy review using traditional sources, and attests citations are real.
- Applies to
- all
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 01 Mar 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Every filing prepared in whole or part using generative AI must include a certification.
- The certification must identify the portion of the filing prepared with generative AI.
- The filer must affirm human review of AI-drafted language for accuracy using print reporters or traditional databases.
- The filer must attest that legal citations are to actual cases or cited authority.
- Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 remain applicable.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-03-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Pretrial and Trial Procedures Memorandum for Civil Cases" (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge John L. Kane, As posted (undated), 2026-03-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cod-kane-2026-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)