Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law
State Bar of California (Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct) · California
last revised 2023-11-16last verified 2026-09-031 version
GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityDisclosureCompetenceSupervision
Practical guidance approved by the State Bar of California on 16 November 2023, the first state bar guidance on generative AI in the United States. California lawyers must not enter confidential client information into tools without adequate protections, must review and verify all output, should consider disclosing AI use to clients, and may not bill for time not spent.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- 16 Nov 2023
- Current version
- Original · 16 Nov 2023
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Confidential information may not be input into a tool lacking adequate confidentiality and security protections.
- Lawyers must critically review AI output for accuracy and bias before use.
- Disclosure to clients of generative AI use is recommended where material to the engagement.
- Fees must reflect time actually spent; AI efficiency savings cannot be billed as hours.
- Supervising lawyers must set policies for AI use by subordinate lawyers and staff.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2023-11-16 | First version recorded. | official |
Related court incidents on the record
- Noland v. Land of the Free, L.P., No. B331918 (Cal. Ct. App.)2025-09-12 Sanctions
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law" (State Bar of California (Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct), Original, 2023-11-16), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/ca-state-bar-generative-ai-practical-guidance (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court