Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Important Notice: Artificial Intelligence
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Autumn D. Spaeth · California
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth’s Central District of California notice requires a separate declaration when generative AI is used to generate any portion of a filing. The filer must disclose AI use and certify review of source material, accuracy, and Rule 11 compliance.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Any party using generative AI for a brief, pleading, or filing must attach a declaration.
- The declaration must disclose AI use.
- The filer must certify source-material review.
- The filer must verify AI-generated content is accurate and Rule 11 compliant.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Important Notice: Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cacd-spaeth-2026-ai-declaration (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)