Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance
Connecticut Judicial Branch (Rules Committee of the Superior Court) · Connecticut
last revised 2026-06-23last verified 2026-09-031 version
Court ruleIn forceVerification dutyCertification
A statewide Connecticut court rule effective 23 June 2026 on publication in the Connecticut Law Journal. Anyone who uses generative AI to create or edit a filed document must independently verify every citation, authority and item of evidence, and the filer's signature certifies diligent compliance. Sanctions include nonsuit or default. It is among the first statewide binding verification rules.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 23 Jun 2026
- Current version
- Original · 23 Jun 2026
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.jud.ct.gov/legalresources/NewsLog/Post?id=6805
What the document requires
- Applies to any filed document created or edited with generative AI, by lawyers or self-represented parties.
- Every citation, legal authority and item of evidence must be independently verified before filing.
- Filing constitutes a certification of good-faith, diligent compliance with the rule.
- Non-compliance may be sanctioned, including by nonsuit or default judgment.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-06-23 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance" (Connecticut Judicial Branch (Rules Committee of the Superior Court), Original, 2026-06-23), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/ct-practice-book-4-9-genai-compliance (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court
- Alabama State Bar Formal Opinion 2026-01: Artificial Intelligence Use — Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct Rules · Alabama State Bar