Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Guidelines to Parties and Counsel in Civil Cases: Disclosure of Use of Artificial Intelligence
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia — Judge Tiffany R. Johnson · Georgia
last revised 2026-09-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Tiffany R. Johnson of the Northern District of Georgia requires counsel and pro se parties in civil cases to disclose AI use in preparing filings or submissions. The guidelines modified September 1, 2026 require a tool-identifying disclosure and a penalty-of-perjury independent-review certification.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 01 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Counsel and pro se parties must disclose AI use to prepare documents filed or submitted to the court.
- If AI was used, the filer must sign and file a Disclosure of Use of Artificial Intelligence.
- The required statement identifies the AI tool and certifies independent review for accuracy, legitimacy, and good law.
- The court does not generally accept mistake, lack of technical expertise, or time constraints as good-faith excuses.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidelines to Parties and Counsel in Civil Cases: Disclosure of Use of Artificial Intelligence" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia — Judge Tiffany R. Johnson, As posted (undated), 2026-09-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-gand-johnson-2026-ai-disclosure (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)