Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation: Artificial Intelligence
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia — Judge Steven D. Grimberg · Georgia
last revised 2026-02-10last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forcePermissive
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filings
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Grimberg of the Northern District of Georgia permits use of AI tools in civil cases but states that human beings remain responsible for filed work. The February 2026 standing order does not require AI disclosure or certification, and it warns parties and lawyers to govern themselves accordingly.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 10 Feb 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The civil standing order says parties may use whatever AI tools they like.
- The order states that only human beings will be held responsible for the outcome.
- Parties and lawyers remain responsible for factual or legal errors in pleadings and papers.
- The standing order applies to civil cases assigned to Judge Steven D. Grimberg.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-02-10 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation: Artificial Intelligence" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia — Judge Steven D. Grimberg, Original, 2026-02-10), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-gand-grimberg-2026-ai-responsibility (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)