Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Singapore

Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024: Guide on the Use of Generative AI Tools by Court Users

Supreme Court of Singapore (with State Courts and Family Justice Courts)

last revised 2024-09-23last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

Practice direction / noteIn forceVerification dutyPermissive

map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigantsAI-generated evidenceSanctions for AI misuse

A guide issued by the Singapore Supreme Court on 23 September 2024 and effective 1 October 2024, mirrored by the State Courts and Family Justice Courts. Court users may use generative AI but are fully responsible for the content, must verify it, must not fabricate evidence, need not declare AI use unless asked, and face personal costs for fabricated authorities.

Applies to
lawyers, litigants, parties
Effective
01 Oct 2024
Current version
Original (issued 23 September 2024) · 23 Sept 2024
Last verified
04 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • No pre-emptive declaration of AI use is required unless the court asks.
  • The user is responsible for all content filed, including verifying citations.
  • Generative AI must not be used to fabricate or alter evidence.
  • Personal costs orders may follow the citation of non-existent authorities.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Original (issued 23 September 2024)current2024-09-23First version recorded.official

Related court incidents on the record

Read our analysis: Singapore's legal AI guidance: courts, ministry, and Law Society →

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024: Guide on the Use of Generative AI Tools by Court Users" (Supreme Court of Singapore (with State Courts and Family Justice Courts), Original (issued 23 September 2024), 2024-09-23), safelegalai.com/regulation/singapore/sg-registrar-circular-1-2024-generative-ai (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Singapore