Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Anne Hwang
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Anne Hwang · California
last revised 2026-07-31last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Anne Hwang requires parties using generative AI to generate any portion of a filing to attach a separate declaration disclosing AI use and certifying that the filer reviewed source material, verified the generated content, and complies with Rule 11.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Amended · 31 Jul 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Any party using generative AI to generate any portion of a brief, pleading, or other filing must attach a separate declaration.
- The declaration must disclose the use of artificial intelligence.
- The declaration must certify review of source material and accuracy of AI-generated content.
- The certification must state compliance with the filer’s Rule 11 obligations.
- The order applies in civil cases and expressly includes pro se litigants in the definition of counsel.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendedcurrent | 2026-07-31 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Anne Hwang" (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Anne Hwang, Amended, 2026-07-31), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cacd-hwang-2026-civil-ai-declaration (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)