Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative Artificial Intelligence
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma — Judge Jason A. Robertson · Oklahoma
last revised 2023-09-27last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Robertson’s standing order requires parties using generative AI in preparing documents for filing to disclose that use in the document, identify the specific tool, and certify that AI-drafted portions have been checked for accuracy, including citations and legal authority.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 27 Sept 2023
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Any party using generative AI in document preparation must disclose use in the document.
- The document must identify the specific AI tool used.
- The filer must certify accuracy of AI-drafted portions, including citations and legal authority.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2023-09-27 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma — Judge Jason A. Robertson, Original, 2023-09-27), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-oked-robertson-2023-generative-ai-disclosure-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)