Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Initial Order Governing All Further Proceedings: Warning Regarding Artificial Intelligence
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama — Judge Anna M. Manasco · Alabama
last revised 2026-06-15last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCompetence
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filings
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Manasco of the Northern District of Alabama warns parties and counsel about false statements generated by artificial intelligence. The June 15, 2026 initial order does not impose a disclosure certification, but it describes show-cause procedures and possible sanctions if AI-generated false law or facts appear in filings.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- 15 Jun 2026
- Current version
- Original · 15 Jun 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The order warns that filings containing false statements of fact or law generated by AI may trigger show-cause proceedings.
- Counsel whose names appear in the signature block may face sanctions under Rule 11 and other authorities.
- Show-cause proceedings will include an in-person hearing and sworn affidavits describing AI use and related events.
- The warning cites prior sanctions orders issued by the court in Johnson v. Dunn and Rivera v. Triad Properties.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-06-15 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Initial Order Governing All Further Proceedings: Warning Regarding Artificial Intelligence" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama — Judge Anna M. Manasco, Original, 2026-06-15), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-alnd-manasco-2026-ai-warning (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)