Camara de Apelacion en lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario, Sala II, Giacomino c/ Monserrat: AI-fabricated citations
Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals of Rosario (Camara de Apelacion en lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario) · Santa Fe
last revised 2025-08-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification duty
map categories:Sanctions for AI misuseDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Argentina's first appellate pronouncement on AI hallucinations: after the lawyer admitted the cited cases were invented by a chatbot, the court held that delegating research to AI and filing unverified citations is extremely risky and even reckless, declined a fine but referred the lawyer to the Rosario bar for disciplinary review and preventive measures.
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- 01 Aug 2025
- Current version
- Judgment (CUIJ 21-11893083-2, August 2025) · 01 Aug 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- No consent relieves a lawyer of the duty to verify sources.
- Filing AI-fabricated jurisprudence breaches professional ethics regardless of good faith.
- Referral to the Colegio de Abogados de Rosario.
- Followed by General Roca (26 fabricated citations) and Neuquen referrals.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judgment (CUIJ 21-11893083-2, August 2025)current | 2025-08-01 | Initial decision; reported by Abogados.com.ar, official text not obtained. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Camara de Apelacion en lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario, Sala II, Giacomino c/ Monserrat: AI-fabricated citations" (Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals of Rosario (Camara de Apelacion en lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario), Judgment (CUIJ 21-11893083-2, August 2025), 2025-08-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/ar-rosario-camara-giacomino-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI