Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court Local Rule 35 — Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court (Yellowstone County) · Montana
last revised 2026-01-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Court ruleIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Local Rule 35 of Montana's Thirteenth Judicial District Court (Yellowstone County) requires an attorney or self-represented party who used generative AI in preparing any document filed with the court to identify the type of AI used and to certify that every citation to law or to the record has been verified as accurate.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- 01 Jan 2026
- Current version
- Local rules signed 1 January 2026 · 01 Jan 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to attorneys and self-represented parties filing in the 13th Judicial District Court
- The filer must identify the type of generative AI used
- The filer must certify that every citation to the law or the record has been verified as accurate
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local rules signed 1 January 2026current | 2026-01-01 | Local Rule 35 on generative AI; some practitioner summaries describe an earlier version effective 1 April 2025 | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court Local Rule 35 — Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence" (Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court (Yellowstone County), Local rules signed 1 January 2026, 2026-01-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-mt-13th-district-local-rule-35-ai (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court