Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Regarding Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge Pratter
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Gene E. K. Pratter · Pennsylvania
last revised 2024-05-03last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Gene E. K. Pratter’s May 3, 2024 standing order requires counsel or self-represented parties to disclose any generative AI use in preparing a complaint, answer, motion, brief, other paper, or court correspondence. If used, the filer must certify every citation to law or the record as authentic and accurate.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 03 May 2024
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to counsel and self-represented parties in cases assigned to Judge Pratter.
- Generative AI use in preparing filings or court correspondence must be disclosed.
- The disclosure must be a clear and plain factual statement.
- The filer must certify every citation to law or the record as authentic and accurate.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-05-03 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Regarding Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge Pratter" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Gene E. K. Pratter, Original, 2024-05-03), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-paed-pratter-2024-genai-disclosure-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)