Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial Field
Supreme People's Court of China
last revised 2022-12-08last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyIn forceProhibitionClient consentRisk classification
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligence
Supreme People's Court normative opinion of 8 December 2022 governing AI across Chinese courts. AI output may only be an auxiliary reference: it shall never substitute for the judge's decision in any case, users may decline AI assistance, and accountability remains with the decision-maker. Systems must be lawful, secure, fair and transparent.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff, providers
- Effective
- 08 Dec 2022
- Current version
- Original · 08 Dec 2022
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- english.court.gov.cn/2022-12/12/c_838810.htm
What the document requires
- Auxiliary-adjudication principle: AI shall not substitute for judges; results are supplementary references only and users may opt out.
- Security and legality: no harm to state secrets, network security, data or privacy.
- Transparency and credibility: systems examined by authoritative entities, with capabilities and limits disclosed.
- Fairness: prevent discrimination and remain accessible to diverse users.
- Targets of integrated AI support across judicial work by 2025 and a full framework by 2030.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2022-12-08 | Issued 8 December 2022; the official Chinese page on court.gov.cn returned 404 on 4 September 2026. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial Field" (Supreme People's Court of China, Original, 2022-12-08), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/cn-spc-opinions-ai-judicial-application-2022 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI