Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Other

Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial Field

Supreme People's Court of China

last revised 2022-12-08last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

PolicyIn forceProhibitionClient consentRisk classification

map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligence

Supreme People's Court normative opinion of 8 December 2022 governing AI across Chinese courts. AI output may only be an auxiliary reference: it shall never substitute for the judge's decision in any case, users may decline AI assistance, and accountability remains with the decision-maker. Systems must be lawful, secure, fair and transparent.

Applies to
judges, court-staff, providers
Effective
08 Dec 2022
Current version
Original · 08 Dec 2022
Last verified
04 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • Auxiliary-adjudication principle: AI shall not substitute for judges; results are supplementary references only and users may opt out.
  • Security and legality: no harm to state secrets, network security, data or privacy.
  • Transparency and credibility: systems examined by authoritative entities, with capabilities and limits disclosed.
  • Fairness: prevent discrimination and remain accessible to diverse users.
  • Targets of integrated AI support across judicial work by 2025 and a full framework by 2030.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Originalcurrent2022-12-08Issued 8 December 2022; the official Chinese page on court.gov.cn returned 404 on 4 September 2026.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial Field" (Supreme People's Court of China, Original, 2022-12-08), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/cn-spc-opinions-ai-judicial-application-2022 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Other