Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order for Civil Cases (generative AI provision), Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes · Illinois
last revised 2023-05-31last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
A standing order for civil cases before Magistrate Judge Gabriel Fuentes of the Northern District of Illinois, revised 31 May 2023 to address generative AI. Any party using a generative AI tool to prepare or draft a filing must disclose that use and identify the tool, and Rule 11 verification obligations apply in full to the resulting content.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 31 May 2023
- Current version
- Original · 31 May 2023
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/
What the document requires
- Parties must disclose in the filing that generative AI was used and name the tool.
- Rule 11 applies to AI-assisted filings; counsel must verify all legal authorities.
- Use of AI for legal research must itself be disclosed if it informed the filing.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2023-05-31 | First version recorded. | official |
Read our analysis: US federal court AI standing orders: who requires what →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order for Civil Cases (generative AI provision), Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes, Original, 2023-05-31), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-nd-ill-fuentes-standing-order-genai (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated Evidence · US Judicial Conference
- Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger) · M.D. Fla. (Berger)
- Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham) · S.D. Ohio (Graham)
- Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR Proceedings · DOJ EOIR
- Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciary · AO of the US Courts
- ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools · ABA