Acuerdo PCSJA24-12243: Guidelines for the respectful, responsible, safe and ethical use of AI in the Judicial Branch
Superior Council of the Judiciary (Consejo Superior de la Judicatura)
last revised 2024-12-16last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
RegulationIn forceVerification dutyDisclosureProhibitionConfidentialityCompetenceSupervisionRecord-keeping
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesClient data in AI toolsCourts' own AI deploymentMandatory AI trainingVendor due diligence
Binding guidelines for all Colombian judges and judicial employees. Article 8 bars free commercial chatbots, use of AI to assess evidence, weigh facts or decide, and entry of personal or confidential data into tools that retain inputs; article 9 requires verification of every output; article 10 requires express disclosure in the file of tool, model, date, purpose and prompts.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 16 Dec 2024
- Current version
- Original (in force on publication) · 16 Dec 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Art. 8(3)-(4): no AI for evidence assessment, fact-finding, value judgments or motivating decisions solely on AI output.
- Art. 8(6): no personal, sensitive or confidential data in tools that retain or retrain on inputs.
- Art. 9: verify the veracity, relevance and sufficiency of results and cited sources.
- Art. 10: disclose in the decision the tool, model, provider, date, purpose, prompts and the passages reproduced.
- Art. 13: Judicial School training plan; art. 14: report AI initiatives and malfunctions to the Digital Transformation Unit.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original (in force on publication)current | 2024-12-16 | Initial guidelines, issued in compliance with Sentencia T-323/2024. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Acuerdo PCSJA24-12243: Guidelines for the respectful, responsible, safe and ethical use of AI in the Judicial Branch" (Superior Council of the Judiciary (Consejo Superior de la Judicatura), Original (in force on publication), 2024-12-16), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/co-csj-acuerdo-pcsja24-12243 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI