Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — Judge John P. Cronan · New York
last revised 2025-10-23last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge John P. Cronan’s revised October 23, 2025 civil rules require an attorney signing an AI-assisted filing to attach a signed certification stating whether the litigant personally reviewed the filing for accuracy and, if so, describing steps taken to verify legal authorities and factual assertions generated by AI.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 23 Oct 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- All litigants are responsible for verifying output produced by an AI tool.
- An attorney signing an AI-assisted filing must attach a signed certification.
- The certification must address review and verification of cited legal authorities and factual assertions.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2025-10-23 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools" (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — Judge John P. Cronan, As posted (undated), 2025-10-23), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-nysd-cronan-2025-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)