Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — Judge Iain D. Johnston · Illinois
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCompetence
map categories:Self-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Johnston’s Northern District of Illinois judge-requirements page states a standing order on AI for counsel and unrepresented parties. It reminds filers using AI in pleadings, motions, papers, or discovery materials that they must comply with Rule 11(b), Rule 26(g), and any other relevant rule.
- Applies to
- all, lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The judge-specific page describes the AI provision as a standing order.
- Counsel and unrepresented parties using AI with filings or discovery must comply with Rule 11(b), Rule 26(g), and other relevant rules.
- The provision covers pleadings, motions, papers, and discovery requests, responses, or objections.
- The page cites commentary questioning whether separate disclosure and certification requirements are necessary.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Artificial Intelligence (AI)" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — Judge Iain D. Johnston, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ilnd-johnston-2023-ai-rule-11-reminder (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)